ArticleHerz2012
[Diagnostic work-up of coronary artery disease: Clinical value of different imaging methods].
Article in Herz, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Computed tomography in patients with chronic stable angina : Fractional flow reserve measurement].Herz · 2017Review
- [Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: from imaging to diagnosis].Der Radiologe · 2013Article
- [Diagnosis and therapy of chronic myocardial ischemia. Role of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging].Herz · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This continuing medical education (CME) article describes the different non-invasive imaging methods with the exception of positron emission tomography for ischemia and viability testing. While stress methods, such as myocardial scintigraphy, stress echo or stress magnetic resonance imaging can detect the functional relevance of coronary artery stenosis, multislice computed tomography allows the visualization of the coronary anatomy and potential stenoses. Recently developed hybrid imaging allows the coronary anatomy and simultaneous functional testing of ischemia to be depicted. The different imaging methods for ischemia and viability testing are described.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23064548What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.