Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23064514›Full record

ReviewDer Pathologe2012

[Translational research and diagnostics for breast cancer].

H H Kreipe

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Pathologe, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

H H KreipeInstitut für Pathologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover. Kreipe.Hans@mh-hannover.de

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In breast cancer, tumor biological markers are gaining impact and have become equal to traditional markers of pathology. Molecular expression profiling has led to new categories, which by receiving translation into immunohistochemical terms have entered routine pathology use. Besides the triple negative (basal) type, there are hormone receptor positive luminal A and B types and the HER2 type. The distinction between luminal A and B type is not yet clear cut and the proliferation marker Ki-67 as well as diverse RNA expression profiles are used for distinction in order to decide which patients might benefit from pure endocrine and which from combined chemo-endocrine therapy. Prospective studies are necessary to answer these questions. Study data are further awaited to clarify the heterogeneity of triple negative cases which include most of the BRCA1 associated cancers and to elucidate whether within the HER2 category, polysome or pseudopolysome cancer will respond to therapy.

Indexed as

Translational Research, BiomedicalBiomarkers, TumorBreastBreast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansKi-67 AntigenLymphatic MetastasisNeoplasm MicrometastasisNeoplasms, Hormone-DependentPrognosisReceptors, EstrogenRNA, MessengerSentinel Lymph Node BiopsyBiomarkers, TumorERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesKi-67 AntigenReceptors, EstrogenRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.