ArticleMedical care2012
Differences in CAHPS reports and ratings of health care provided to adults and children.
Article in Medical care, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient Satisfaction in the Hand Surgery Clinic: An Analysis of Factors That Impact the Press Ganey Survey.The Journal of hand surgery · 2019Article
- Patient-level Factors and the Quality of Care Delivered in Pediatric Emergency Departments.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2018Observational
- Possibilities for Shortening the CAHPS Clinician and Group Survey.Medical care · 2016Article
- A Comparison of the Request Process and Outcomes in Adult and Pediatric Organ Donation.Pediatrics · 2015Article
- Real-time patient survey data during routine clinical activities for rapid-cycle quality improvement.JMIR medical informatics · 2015Article
- Medical home characteristics and the pediatric patient experience.Medical care · 2014Article
- Parent perceptions of children's hospital safety climate.BMJ quality & safety · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundConsumer assessment of health care is an important metric for evaluating quality of care. These assessments can help purchasers, health plans, and providers deliver care that fits patients' needs.
objectiveTo examine differences in reports and ratings of care delivered to adults and children and whether they vary by site. RESEARCH
designThis observational study compares adult and child experiences with care at a large west coast medical center and affiliated clinics and a large mid-western health plan using Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Clinician & Group 1.0 Survey data.
resultsOffice staff helpfulness and courtesy was perceived more positively for adult than pediatric care in the west coast site. In contrast, more positive perceptions of pediatric care were observed in both sites for coordination of care, shared decision making, overall rating of the doctor, and willingness to recommend the doctor to family and friends. In addition, pediatric care was perceived more positively in the mid-west site for access to care, provider communication, and office staff helpfulness and courtesy. The differences between pediatric care and adult care were larger in the mid-western site than the west coast site.
conclusionsThere are significant differences in the perception of care for children and adults with care provided to children tending to be perceived more positively. Further research is needed to identify the reasons for these differences and provide more definitive information at sites throughout the United States.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.