Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23063690›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunological methods2013

Performance evaluation of the MBio Diagnostics point-of-care CD4 counter.

Cathy Logan, Monique Givens, Jeffrey T Ives, Marie Delaney, Michael J Lochhead, Robert T Schooley, Constance A Benson

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunological methods, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Near patient CD4 count in a hospitalized HIV patient population.Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry · 2017
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Developments in CD4 and viral load monitoring in resource-limited settings.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cathy LoganDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of California, 9500 Gilman Drive, MC 0711, San Diego, CA 92093, USA. c1logan@ucsd.edu
Monique Givens
Jeffrey T Ives
Marie Delaney
Michael J Lochhead
Robert T Schooley
Constance A Benson
MBio Diagnostics (United States) · USUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

Low Cost Laser Diagnostic for CD4+ T Cell CountingR44AI070052 · NIAID · PRECISION PHOTONICS CORPORATION (PPC) · PI LOCHHEAD, MICHAEL J · 2009 to 2013
$2.6M
Low Cost Laser Diagnostic for CD4+ T Cell CountingR43AI070052 · NIAID · PRECISION PHOTONICS CORPORATION (PPC) · PI MYATT, CHRISTOPHER JOHN · 2006 to 2006
$86k
NIAID NIH HHS AI070052NIAID NIH HHS R43 AI070052NIAID NIH HHS R44 AI070052
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The measurement of the absolute CD4 T-cell count is critical in the initial evaluation and staging of HIV-infected persons, yet access to this technology remains limited in many low resource settings where disease burden is highest. Here we evaluate the performance of a prototype point-of-care device (POC) to quantify CD4 T cells from MBio Diagnostics, Inc. Whole blood samples, both venous and capillary (finger stick), were collected from known HIV-infected participants at the University of California, San Diego Antiviral Research Center, and tested using the MBio system and conventional flow cytometry. A total of 94 venipuncture and 52 capillary samples were processed and statistical analyses included comparison to flow cytometry results. For the venipuncture samples, Bland-Altman analysis resulted in a mean bias of -10 cells/μL (-23 to +3 cells/μL, 95% CI), and limits of agreement (LOA) of -132 and +112 cells/μL. For the capillary samples, Bland-Altman resulted in a mean bias of -4 cells/μL (-31 to +23 cells/μL, 95% CL), and LOA of -195 and +186 cells/μL. For the San Diego study cohort, the prototype MBio system showed negligible quantitative bias relative to flow cytometry. Higher variability was observed in the capillary samples relative to venipuncture, but system precision for both capillary and venipuncture samples was good. There was also close agreement between results from the same participant when tested with two different systems, different operators and different locations. This preliminary evaluation suggests that the MBio CD4 device holds promise as a POC system for quantitation of CD4 T cells in limited-resource settings.

Indexed as

Point-of-Care SystemsAdultAgedCD4 Lymphocyte CountFemaleFlow CytometryHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID23063690
PMCPMC3529779
OpenAlexW2052339022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.