Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23063220›Full record

ArticleJournal of endodontics2012

Large-scale clinical endodontic research in the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network: study overview and methods.

Donald R Nixdorf, Alan S Law, John O Look, D Brad Rindal, Emily U Durand, Wenjun Kang, Bonita S Agee, Jeffrey L Fellows, Valeria V Gordan, Gregg H Gilbert and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of endodontics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Donald R NixdorfDivision of Temporomandibular Disorders and Orofacial Pain, School of Dentistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. nixdorf@umn.edu
Alan S Law
John O Look
D Brad Rindal
Emily U Durand
Wenjun Kang
Bonita S Agee
Jeffrey L Fellows
Valeria V Gordan
Gregg H Gilbert
National Dental PBRN Collaborative Group
HealthPartners · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Minnesota · USKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research · USUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Minnesota Medical Center · US

Funding

The National Dental PBRNU19DE022516 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI GILBERT, GREGG H · 2012 to 2018
$66.4M
Dental PBRN Network ChairU01DE016747 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI GILBERT, GREGG H · 2005 to 2011
$17.3M
Scholar Development Clinical Research (RMI)K12RR023247 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI LUEPKER, RUSSELL V · 2005 to 2009
$13.5M
Dental Practice-Based Research Network Coordinating CtrU01DE016746 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI FUNKHOUSER, ELLEN M · 2005 to 2011
$7.0M
NCRR NIH HHS K12 RR023247NCRR NIH HHS K12-RR023247NIDCR NIH HHS U01 DE016746NIDCR NIH HHS U01 DE016747NIDCR NIH HHS U01-DE16746NIDCR NIH HHS U01-DE16747NIDCR NIH HHS U19 DE022516NIDCR NIH HHS U19-DE22516
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis article reports on the feasibility of conducting a large-scale endodontic prospective cohort study in The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network. This study was designed to measure pain and burden associated with initial orthograde root canal therapy (RCT) and to explore potential prognostic factors for pain outcomes. The main objectives of this first report in a series are to describe the project's feasibility and methods and the demographics of the sample obtained.

methodsSixty-two dentist practitioner-investigators (ie, 46 generalists and 16 endodontists) in 5 geographic areas were certified within the network and trained regarding the standardized study protocol. Enrollment and baseline data collection occurred over 6 months with postobturation follow-up for another 6 months. Patients and dentists completed questionnaires before and immediately after treatment visits. Patients also completed questionnaires at 1 week, 3 months, and 6 months after obturation.

resultsEnrollment exceeded target expectations, with 708 eligible patient-participants. Questionnaire return rates were good, ranging between 90% and 100%. Patient demographics were typical of persons who receive RCT in the United States (ie, mean age = 48 years [standard deviation = 13 years], with most being female [59%], college educated [81%], white non-Hispanic [86%], and having dental insurance [81%]). The tooth types being treated were also typical (ie, 61% molars, 28% premolars, and 11% anteriors, with maxillary teeth being predominant [59%]).

conclusionsThis study shows the feasibility of conducting large-scale endodontic prospective cohort studies in the network. Patients were rapidly recruited with high levels of compliance in data collection.

Indexed as

EndodonticsAdultAgedCohort StudiesCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchDental ResearchFacial PainFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRoot Canal TherapyStatistics, NonparametricSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID23063220
PMCPMC3652657
OpenAlexW2060456613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.