Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23063077›Full record

ReviewAdvances in immunology2012

Lymphocyte development: integration of DNA damage response signaling.

Jeffrey J Bednarski, Barry P Sleckman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in immunology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. When DNA-damage responses meet innate and adaptive immunity.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. CHD4 is essential for transcriptional repression and lineage progression in B lymphopoiesis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jeffrey J BednarskiDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Barry P Sleckman
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

THE V(D)J RECOMBINATION REACTION AND ITS IMPACT ON LYMPHOCYTE DEVELOPMENTR01AI047829 · NIAID · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI SLECKMAN, BARRY P · 2000 to 2021
$7.0M
ATM FUNCTION DURING V(D)J RECOMBINATIONR01AI074953 · NIAID · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI SLECKMAN, BARRY P · 2009 to 2023
$5.9M
ACTIVATION OF CELLULAR SIGNALING PATHWAYS BY DNA DOUBLE STRAND BREAKSR01CA136470 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BASSING, CRAIG H, SLECKMAN, BARRY P · 2009 to 2013
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS CA136470NCI NIH HHS R01 CA136470NIAID NIH HHS AI074953NIAID NIH HHS AI47829NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI047829NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI074953
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lymphocytes traverse functionally discrete stages as they develop into mature B and T cells. This development is directed by cues from a variety of different cell surface receptors. To complete development, all lymphocytes must express a functional nonautoreactive heterodimeric antigen receptor. The genes that encode antigen receptor chains are assembled through the process of V(D)J recombination, a reaction that proceeds through DNA double-stranded break (DSB) intermediates. These DSBs are generated by the RAG endonuclease in G1-phase developing lymphocytes and activate ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM), the kinase that orchestrates cellular DSB responses. The canonical DNA damage response includes cell cycle arrest, DNA break repair, and apoptosis of cells when DSBs are not repaired. However, recent studies have demonstrated that ATM activation in response to RAG DSBs also regulates a transcriptional program including many genes with no known function in canonical DNA damage responses. Rather, these genes have activities that would be important for lymphocyte development. Here, these findings and the broader concept that signals initiated by physiologic DNA DSBs provide cues that regulate cell type-specific processes and functions are discussed.

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA RepairSignal TransductionAnimalsHumansLymphocytesReceptors, AntigenReceptors, Antigen

Identifiers

PMID23063077
PMCPMC3654785
OpenAlexW1542005181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.