ArticleJournal of diabetes science and technology2012
Real-time state estimation and long-term model adaptation: a two-sided approach toward personalized diagnosis of glucose and insulin levels.
Article in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Adaptive Method for Quantitative Estimation of Glucose and Fructose Concentrations in Aqueous Solutions Based on Infrared Nanoantenna Optics.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Adaptive and Personalized Plasma Insulin Concentration Estimation for Artificial Pancreas Systems.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2018Article
- An Adaptive Nonlinear Basal-Bolus Calculator for Patients With Type 1 Diabetes.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2017Article
- A novel mathematical model detecting early individual changes of insulin resistance.Diabetes technology & therapeutics · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWith continuous glucose sensors (CGSs), it is possible to obtain a dynamical signal of the patient's subcutaneous glucose concentration in real time. How could that information be exploited? We suggest a model-based diagnosis system with a twofold objective: real-time state estimation and long-term model parameter identification.
methodsTo obtain a dynamical model, Bergman's nonlinear minimal model (considering plasma glucose G, insulin I, and interstitial insulin X) is extended by two states describing first and second insulin response. Furthermore, compartments for oral glucose and subcutaneous insulin inputs as well as for subcutaneous glucose measurement are added. The observability of states and external inputs as well as the identifiability of model parameters are assessed using the empirical observability Gramian. Signals are estimated for different nondiabetic and diabetic scenarios by unscented Kalman filter.
results(1) Observability of different state subsets is evaluated, e.g., from CGSs, {G, I} or {G, X} can be observed and the set {G, I, X} cannot. (2) Model parameters are included, e.g., it is possible to estimate the second-phase insulin response gain k(G2) additionally. This can be used for model adaptation and as a diagnostic parameter that is almost zero for diabetes patients. (3) External inputs are considered, e.g., oral glucose is theoretically observable for nondiabetic patients, but estimation scenarios show that the time delay of 1 h limits application.
conclusionsA real-time estimation of states (such as plasma insulin I) and parameters (such as k(G2)) is possible, which allows an improved real-time state prediction and a personalized model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.