Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23062713›Full record

ArticleCell reports2012

Defining the status of RNA polymerase at promoters.

Leighton J Core, Joshua J Waterfall, Daniel A Gilchrist, David C Fargo, Hojoong Kwak, Karen Adelman, John T Lis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 183 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
183citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

183 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Direct roles of long non-coding RNAs in transcription activation.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Role of eRNAs in Cardiovascular Diseases.Current cardiology reviews · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Cell-cycle-regulated transcriptional pausing ofMolecular biology of the cell · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

123 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Leighton J CoreDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Joshua J Waterfall
Daniel A Gilchrist
David C Fargo
Hojoong Kwak
Karen Adelman
John T Lis

Funding

Investigating Transcriptional Responses to the EnvironmentZIAES101987 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ADELMAN, KAREN L · 2009 to 2016
$15.9M
COORDINATE GENE REGULATION IN ANIMAL CELLSR01GM025232 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI LIS, JOHN T · 1985 to 2020
$8.4M
Investigating Transcriptional Responses to the EnvironmentZ01ES101987 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ADELMAN, KAREN L · 2006 to 2008
$2.8M
COORDINATE GENE REGULATION IN ANIMAL CELLSR37GM025232 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI LIS, JOHN THOMAS · 1995 to 2004
$2.5M
Quantifying the Genome-wide Distribution of Transcriptionally-engaged RNA PolymerR01HG004845 · NHGRI · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI LIS, JOHN T · 2009 to 2011
$1.0M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 ES101987NHGRI NIH HHS HG004845NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG004845NIGMS NIH HHS GM25232NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM025232NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM025232
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent genome-wide studies in metazoans have shown that RNA polymerase II (Pol II) accumulates to high densities on many promoters at a rate-limited step in transcription. However, the status of this Pol II remains an area of debate. Here, we compare quantitative outputs of a global run-on sequencing assay and chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing assays and demonstrate that the majority of the Pol II on Drosophila promoters is transcriptionally engaged; very little exists in a preinitiation or arrested complex. These promoter-proximal polymerases are inhibited from further elongation by detergent-sensitive factors, and knockdown of negative elongation factor, NELF, reduces their levels. These results not only solidify the notion that pausing occurs at most promoters, but demonstrate that it is the major rate-limiting step in early transcription at these promoters. Finally, the divergent elongation complexes seen at mammalian promoters are far less prevalent in Drosophila, and this specificity in orientation correlates with directional core promoter elements, which are abundant in Drosophila.

Indexed as

AnimalsChromatin ImmunoprecipitationDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsPromoter Regions, GeneticRNA InterferenceRNA Polymerase IIRNA, Small InterferingTranscription FactorsTranscription, GeneticDrosophila Proteinsnegative elongation factorRNA Polymerase IIRNA, Small InterferingTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID23062713
PMCPMC3483431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.