Boning-up on aortic valve calcification.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Prognostic value of heart valve calcifications for cardiovascular events in a lung cancer screening population.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2015
   Trial
2. Role of oxidative stress in calcific aortic valve disease and its therapeutic implications.Cardiovascular research · 2022
   Review
3. Dysregulation of ossification-related miRNAs in circulating osteogenic progenitor cells obtained from patients with aortic stenosis.Clinical science (London, England : 1979) · 2016
   Article
4. Molecular and cellular aspects of calcific aortic valve disease.Circulation research · 2013
   Review

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Role of circulating osteogenic progenitor cells in calcific aortic stenosis.2012

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as