Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23062276›Full record

Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2012

Late pharmacologic conditioning with volatile anesthetics after cardiac surgery.

Marc P Steurer, Martina A Steurer, Werner Baulig, Tobias Piegeler, Martin Schläpfer, Donat R Spahn, Volkmar Falk, Pamela Dreessen, Oliver M Theusinger, Edith R Schmid and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00924222 (Organ Protection With Sevoflurane Postconditioning After Cardiac Surgery With Cardiopulmonary Bypass), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00924222 nacompletednot on this map

Organ Protection With Sevoflurane Postconditioning After Cardiac Surgery With Cardiopulmonary Bypass

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ZurichRan2007 to 2009Enrolled120ConditionsCardiac On-pump SurgeryArmsSevoflurane, Propofol
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Inhaled volatile anesthetics in the intensive care unit.World journal of critical care medicine · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Cardioprotection with halogenated gases: how does it occur?Drug design, development and therapy · 2017
    Review
  18. Post-conditioning: promising answers and more questions.Critical care (London, England) · 2012
    Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Marc P Steurer
Martina A Steurer
Werner Baulig
Tobias Piegeler
Martin Schläpfer
Donat R Spahn
Volkmar Falk
Pamela Dreessen
Oliver M Theusinger
Edith R Schmid
David Schwartz
Thomas A Neff
Beatrice Beck-Schimmer
University Hospital of Zurich · CHSan Francisco General Hospital · USSwiss Integrative Center for Human Health · CHUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · USUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe aim of this randomized controlled trial was to investigate whether volatile anesthetics used for postoperative sedation have any beneficial effects on myocardial injury in cardiac surgery patients after on-pump valve replacement.

methodsAnesthesia was performed with propofol. After arrival in the intensive care unit (ICU), 117 patients were randomized to be sedated for at least 4 hours with either propofol or sevoflurane. Sevoflurane was administered by using the anesthetic-conserving device. Troponin T, creatine kinase, creatine kinase from heart muscle tissue, myoglobin, and oxygenation index were determined on arrival at the ICU, 4 hours after sedation, and in the morning of the first postoperative day (POD1). Primary end points were cardiac injury markers on POD1. As secondary end points oxygenation, postoperative pulmonary complications, and ICU and hospital stay were documented.

resultsFifty-six patients were analyzed in the propofol arm, and 46 patients in the sevoflurane arm. Treatment groups were comparable with regard to patient demographics and intraoperative characteristics. Concentration of troponin T as the most sensitive marker for myocardial injury at POD1 was significantly lower in the sevoflurane group compared with the propofol group (unadjusted difference, -0.4; 95% CI, -0.7 to -0.1; P < 0.01; adjusted difference, -0.2; 95% CI, -0.4 to -0.02; P = 0.03, respectively).

conclusionsThe data presented in this investigation indicate that late postconditioning with the volatile anesthetic sevoflurane might mediate cardiac protection, even with a late, brief, and low-dose application.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00924222.

Indexed as

AgedAnesthetics, InhalationCardiac Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansMaleMethyl EthersMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsPropofolProspective StudiesSevofluraneAnesthetics, InhalationMethyl EthersPropofolSevoflurane

Identifiers

PMID23062276
PMCPMC3682293
OpenAlexW1984707399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.