Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23062065›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2012

Writing implementation research grant proposals: ten key ingredients.

Enola K Proctor, Byron J Powell, Ana A Baumann, Ashley M Hamilton, Ryan L Santens

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 92 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03316547 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Supporting and Enhancing NICU Sensory Experiences to Optimize Developmental Outcomes in Preterm Infants

TypeinterventionalSponsorWashington University School of MedicineRan2017 to 2019Enrolled70ConditionsPremature Birth of NewbornArmsSENSE Program
NCT05019131 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Addressing Provider Stress and Unconscious Bias to Improve Quality of Maternal Health Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2021 to 2023Enrolled83ConditionsMaternal Health, Mental Health, Healthcare Provider, Adverse OutcomesArmsTraining, Peer support and mentorship, Leadership engagement, Embedded champions
NCT06085105 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Caring for Providers to Improve Patient Experience (CPIPE) Study: A Cluster Randomized-controlled Trial to Assess the Impact of the CPIPE Intervention on Person-centered Maternity Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2024 to 2026Enrolled6,379ConditionsStress, Psychological, Maternal Health, Healthcare Provider, Adverse OutcomesArmsCPIPE Training, Peer support groups, Mentorship, Leadership engagement, Embedded champions
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Schools' Readiness for Child Sexual Abuse Prevention Education: an Overview of Theoretical Models.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2025
    Review
  20. An introduction to implementation science in rehabilitation medicine.PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Enola K ProctorCenter for Mental Health Services Research, George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St, Louis, St, Louis, MO 63130, USA. ekp@wustl.edu
Byron J Powell
Ana A Baumann
Ashley M Hamilton
Ryan L Santens

Funding

Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences (UL1)UL1RR024992 · NCRR · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2007 to 2011
$45.4M
Washington University Center for Diabetes Translation Research P30DK092950 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Ross C Brownson, Debra Haire-Joshu · 2011 to 2026
$11.7M
OPERATIONS CORE (285-351)P30MH068579 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MCMILLEN, J. CURTIS · 2004 to 2008
$7.0M
IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES IRI-MHSR25MH080916 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Byron James Powell · 2009 to 2026
$3.7M
Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesTL1TR000449 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$2.5M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR000449NCRR NIH HHS T32 RR024992NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024992NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092950NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH068579NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH080916
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAll investigators seeking funding to conduct implementation research face the challenges of preparing a high-quality proposal and demonstrating their capacity to conduct the proposed study. Applicants need to demonstrate the progressive nature of their research agenda and their ability to build cumulatively upon the literature and their own preliminary studies. Because implementation science is an emerging field involving complex and multilevel processes, many investigators may not feel equipped to write competitive proposals, and this concern is pronounced among early stage implementation researchers. DISCUSSION: This article addresses the challenges of preparing grant applications that succeed in the emerging field of dissemination and implementation. We summarize ten ingredients that are important in implementation research grants. For each, we provide examples of how preliminary data, background literature, and narrative detail in the application can strengthen the application. SUMMARY: Every investigator struggles with the challenge of fitting into a page-limited application the research background, methodological detail, and information that can convey the project's feasibility and likelihood of success. While no application can include a high level of detail about every ingredient, addressing the ten ingredients summarized in this article can help assure reviewers of the significance, feasibility, and impact of the proposed research.

Indexed as

Financing, OrganizedResearch DesignWritingCooperative BehaviorEvidence-Based MedicineHealth Services ResearchHumansOrganizational InnovationTranslational Research, Biomedical

Identifiers

PMID23062065
PMCPMC3541090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.