Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23061914›Full record

ArticleNanotoxicology2013

An in vivo and in vitro toxicological characterisation of realistic nanoscale CeO₂ inhalation exposures.

Philip Demokritou, Samuel Gass, Georgios Pyrgiotakis, Joel M Cohen, William Goldsmith, Walt McKinney, David Frazer, Jane Ma, Diane Schwegler-Berry, Joseph Brain and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanotoxicology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. SiOScientific reports · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Environmental science. Nano · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Hollow CeOInternational journal of nanomedicine · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. TheRSC advances · 2020
    Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Philip DemokritouDepartment of Environmental Health, Center for Nanotechnology and Nanotoxicology, Harvard School of Public Health, Harvard University , 665 Huntington Avenue, 02115 Boston, MA , USA.
Samuel Gass
Georgios Pyrgiotakis
Joel M Cohen
William Goldsmith
Walt McKinney
David Frazer
Jane Ma
Diane Schwegler-Berry
Joseph Brain
Vincent Castranova

Funding

Translational Research Support CoreP30ES000002 · NIEHS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI SUSAN A KORRICK · 1985 to 2026
$44.6M
NIEHS NIH HHS ES00000002NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES000002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanoscale CeO₂ is increasingly used for industrial and commercial applications, including catalysis, UV-shielding and as an additive in various nanocomposites. Because of its increasing potential for consumer and occupational exposures, a comprehensive toxicological characterisation of this nanomaterial is needed. Preliminary results from intratracheal instillation studies in rats point to cytotoxicity and inflammation, though these studies may not accurately use realistic nanoscale exposure profiles. By contrast, published in vitro cellular studies have reported limited toxicological outcomes for the case of nano-ceria. Here, the authors present an integrative study evaluating the toxicity of nanoscale CeO₂ both in vitro, using the A549 lung epithelial cell line, and in vivo using an intact rat model. Realistic nano-ceria exposure atmospheres were generated using the Harvard Versatile Engineered Nanomaterial Generation System (VENGES), and rats were exposed via inhalation. Finally, the use of a nanothin amorphous SiO₂ encapsulation coating as a means of mitigating CeO₂ toxicity was assessed. Results from the inhalation experiments show lung injury and inflammation with increased PMN and LDH levels in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of the CeO₂-exposed rats. Moreover, exposure to SiO₂-coated CeO₂ did not induce any pulmonary toxicity to the animals, representing clear evidence for the safe by design SiO₂-encapsualtion concept.

Indexed as

AnimalsBronchoalveolar Lavage FluidCell LineCeriumHumansInhalation ExposureL-Lactate DehydrogenaseMacrophages, AlveolarMaleMetal NanoparticlesNeutrophilsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyToxicity Testsceric oxideCeriumL-Lactate Dehydrogenase

Identifiers

PMID23061914
PMCPMC4438163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.