ArticleDrugs2012
Ruxolitinib: in the treatment of myelofibrosis.
Article in Drugs, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- JAK2 inhibitors for the treatment of Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms: current status and future directions.Molecular diversity · 2024Review
- Study of Symptom Severity and Adherence to Therapy of Myelofibrosis Patients Treated with Ruxolitinib.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Impact of JAK/STAT inhibitors on human monocyte-derived-macrophages stimulated by cigarette smoke extract and lipopolysaccharide.Clinical and experimental pharmacology & physiology · 2022Article
- Cancer patients and targeted therapy during COVID-19 pandemic: A descriptive case series study.Clinical case reports · 2022Article
- Cardiac complications in a patient affected by systemic mastocytosis and primitive myelofibrosis: A case report.Clinical case reports · 2021Article
- MPL overexpression induces a high level of mutant-CALR/MPL complex: a novel mechanism of ruxolitinib resistance in myeloproliferative neoplasms with CALR mutations.International journal of hematology · 2021Article
- Safety perspectives on presently considered drugs for the treatment of COVID-19.British journal of pharmacology · 2020Review
- Experimental Pharmaceuticals for Steroid-Refractory Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease.Journal of experimental pharmacology · 2020Review
- Development of a symptom assessment in patients with myelofibrosis: qualitative study findings.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2019Article
- Genomic Profiling of T-Cell Neoplasms Reveals FrequentJCO precision oncology · 2018Article
- Ruxolitinib induces autophagy in chronic myeloid leukemia cells.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2016Article
- Ruxolitinib: A Review in Polycythaemia Vera.Drugs · 2015Review
- Review
- Megakaryocyte polyploidy is inhibited by lysyl oxidase propeptide.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2013Article
- A case of Philadelphia chromosome positive myeloproliferative neoplasm in a pregnant woman with unusual primary myelofibrosis features.Case reports in hematology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ruxolitinib is a selective inhibitor of Janus kinases (JAK) 1 and 2, which are involved in the signalling pathway of various cytokines and growth factors essential to haematopoiesis. JAK 1 and 2 are implicated in the development of myelofibrosis, as well as other haematological malignancies. Ruxolitinib is the first agent approved for the treatment of myelofibrosis. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial (COMFORT-I) in patients with myelofibrosis, significantly more ruxolitinib than placebo recipients achieved a ≥ 35% reduction in spleen volume (primary endpoint) at 24 weeks. In a randomized, open-label, multicentre trial (COMFORT-II) in patients with myelofibrosis, significantly more ruxolitinib than best available therapy recipients achieved the same primary endpoint at 48 weeks. Significantly more ruxolitinib than placebo recipients achieved a ≥ 50% reduction in Total Symptom Score at 24 weeks in COMFORT-I. Ruxolitinib generally improved health-related quality-of-life scores, while best available therapy was generally associated with worsened scores at 48 weeks in COMFORT-II. In COMFORT-I, overall survival data appeared to favour ruxolitinib over placebo; of note, most placebo recipients had crossed over to receive ruxolitinib. In COMFORT-II, a significant difference in overall survival between ruxolitinib and best available therapy was not shown; this trial was not powered to detect such a difference. In clinical trials in patients with myelofibrosis, ruxolitinib was generally associated with an acceptable tolerability profile. In the placebo-controlled trial, the most commonly reported grade 3 or 4 adverse events in ruxolitinib recipients were thrombocytopenia, anaemia and neutropenia. These haematological adverse events were mainly managed with dosage interruptions/reductions and/or transfusions, and rarely resulted in discontinuation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.