Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23061694›Full record

ArticlePaediatric and perinatal epidemiology2012

Trends in the use of antiepileptic drugs among pregnant women in the US, 2001-2007: a medication exposure in pregnancy risk evaluation program study.

William V Bobo, Robert L Davis, Sengwee Toh, De-Kun Li, Susan E Andrade, T Craig Cheetham, Pamala Pawloski, Sascha Dublin, Simone Pinheiro, Tarek Hammad and 8 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pregnancy and Delivery Outcomes Following Benzodiazepine Exposure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Patterns of antiseizure medication prescription in pregnancy and maternal complications in women with epilepsy: A retrospective study in Saudi Arabia.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Perampanel and pregnancy.Epilepsia · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 11 institutions in 2 countries.

William V BoboDepartment of Psychiatry, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine; Nashville, TN 37211, USA. william.v.bobo@vanderbilt.edu
Robert L Davis
Sengwee Toh
De-Kun Li
Susan E Andrade
T Craig Cheetham
Pamala Pawloski
Sascha Dublin
Simone Pinheiro
Tarek Hammad
Pamela E Scott
Richard A Epstein
Patrick G Arbogast
James A Morrow
Judith A Dudley
Jean M Lawrence
Lyndsay A Avalos
William O Cooper
Vanderbilt University · USKaiser Permanente · USNashville Oncology Associates · USUnited States Food and Drug Administration · USFood and Drug Administration · THGroup Health Cooperative · USHarvard University · USHealthPartners · USKaiser Permanente Oakland Medical Center · USMassachusetts Academy of Math and Science at WPI · USSoutheast Health District · US

Funding

Pharmacepidemiology in the elderly: medications pneumonia risk and confoundingK23AG028954 · NIA · KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON · PI DUBLIN, SASCHA · 2007 to 2011
$864k
Pharmacoepidemiology of Atypical Antipsychotic DrugsK23MH087747 · NIMH · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI BOBO, WILLIAM V · 2010 to 2013
$686k
NIA NIH HHS K23 AG028954NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH087747
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle is known about the extent of antiepileptic drug (AED) use in pregnancy, particularly for newer agents. Our objective was to assess whether AED use has increased among pregnant women in the US, 2001-2007.

methodsWe analysed data from the Medication Exposure in Pregnancy Risk Evaluation Program (MEPREP) database, 1 January 2001 to 31 December 2007. We identified liveborn deliveries among women, aged 15-45 years on delivery date, who were members of MEPREP health plans (n=585615 deliveries). Pregnancy exposure to AEDs, determined through outpatient pharmacy dispensing files. Older AEDs were available for clinical use before 1993; other agents were considered newer AEDs. Information on sociodemographic and medical/reproductive factors was obtained from linked birth certificate files. Maternal diagnoses were identified based on ICD-9 codes.

resultsPrevalence of AED use during pregnancy increased between 2001 (15.7 per 1000 deliveries) and 2007 (21.9 per 1000 deliveries), driven primarily by a fivefold increase in the use of newer AEDs. Thirteen per cent of AED-exposed deliveries involved a combination of two or more AEDs. Psychiatric disorders were the most prevalent diagnoses, followed by epileptic and pain disorders, among AED users regardless of AED type, year of conception or gestational period.

conclusionsAED use during pregnancy increased between 2001 and 2007, driven by a fivefold increase in the use of newer AEDs. Nearly one in eight AED-exposed deliveries involved the concomitant use of more than one AED. Additional investigations of the reproductive safety of newer AEDs may be needed.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnticonvulsantsCohort StudiesDrug PrescriptionsDrug UtilizationEpilepsyFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPregnancyPrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsProgram EvaluationRiskUnited StatesYoung AdultAnticonvulsants

Identifiers

PMID23061694
PMCPMC3481178
OpenAlexW2122431006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.