Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23061629›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2012

Genomic DNA extraction from cells by electroporation on an integrated microfluidic platform.

Tao Geng, Ning Bao, Nammalwar Sriranganathanw, Liwu Li, Chang Lu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Tao GengDepartment of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, United States.
Ning Bao
Nammalwar Sriranganathanw
Liwu Li
Chang Lu
Virginia Tech · USNantong University · CNPurdue University West Lafayette · USVirginia Tech - Wake Forest University School of Biomedical Engineering & Sciences · US

Funding

Modulation of innate immune cellular homeostasis and inflammation resolutionR01HL115835 · NHLBI · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI LI, LIWU · 2012 to 2021
$3.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL115835NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL115835
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The vast majority of genetic analysis of cells involves chemical lysis for release of DNA molecules. However, chemical reagents required in the lysis interfere with downstream molecular biology and often require removal after the step. Electrical lysis based on irreversible electroporation is a promising technique to prepare samples for genetic analysis due to its purely physical nature, fast speed, and simple operation. However, there has been no experimental confirmation on whether electrical lysis extracts genomic DNA from cells in a reproducible and efficient fashion in comparison to chemical lysis, especially for eukaryotic cells that have most of the DNA enclosed in the nucleus. In this work, we construct an integrated microfluidic chip that physically traps a low number of cells, lyses the cells using electrical pulses rapidly, then purifies and concentrates genomic DNA. We demonstrate that electrical lysis offers high efficiency for DNA extraction from both eukaryotic cells (up to ∼36% for Chinese hamster ovary cells) and bacterial cells (up to ∼45% for Salmonella typhimurium) that is comparable to the widely used chemical lysis. The DNA extraction efficiency has dependence on both the electric parameters and relative amount of beads used for DNA adsorption. We envision that electroporation-based DNA extraction will find use in ultrasensitive assays that benefit from minimal dilution and simple procedures.

Indexed as

AnimalsCHO CellsCricetinaeCricetulusDNA, BacterialElectroporationGenome, BacterialMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesPolymerase Chain ReactionSalmonella typhimuriumDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID23061629
PMCPMC3492889
OpenAlexW2050304465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.