Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23061054›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2012

Bacterial toxin modulation of the eukaryotic cell cycle: are all cytolethal distending toxins created equally?

Amandeep Gargi, Michael Reno, Steven R Blanke

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Epidemiology of NontyphoidalAnnals of laboratory medicine · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Revisiting bacterial cytolethal distending toxin structure and function.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
  9. International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. The Active Subunit of the Cytolethal Distending Toxin, CdtB, Derived From BothFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  16. Gut Microbiota and Colon Cancer: A Role for Bacterial Protein Toxins?International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. The Cell-Cycle Regulatory Protein p21Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amandeep GargiDepartment of Microbiology, Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois Urbana, IL, USA.
Michael Reno
Steven R Blanke
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

Cellular Intoxication Pathway of Cytolethal Distending ToxinR01GM098756 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BRADLEY, KENNETH ALAN · 2011 to 2014
$1.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM0908756NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM098756
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cytolethal distending toxins (CDTs) comprise a family of intracellular-acting bacterial protein toxins whose actions upon eukaryotic cells result in several consequences, the most characteristic of which is the induction of G(2)/M cell cycle arrest. Most CDTs are hetero-tripartite assemblies of CdtA, CdtB, and CdtC, with CdtB required for CDT-mediated cell cycle arrest. Several lines of evidence indicate that CdtA and CdtC are required for the optimal intracellular activity of CdtB, although the exact functional roles of CdtA and CdtC remain poorly understood. The genes encoding the CDTs have been identified in a diverse array of Gram-negative pathogenic bacteria. More recently, the genes encoding several CdtB subunits have been associated with alternatively linked subunits resembling the B-subunits of pertussis toxin. Although the CDTs are generally considered to all function as bacterial genotoxins, the extent to which individual members of the CDTs employ similar mechanisms of cell surface binding, uptake, and trafficking within sensitive cells is poorly understood. Recently, data have begun to emerge suggesting differences in the molecular basis by which individual CDTs interact with and enter host cells, suggesting the possibility that CDTs possess properties reflecting the specific niches idiosyncratic to those CDT bacterial pathogens that produce them. The extent to which functional differences between individual CDTs reflect the specific requirements for intoxicating cells and tissues within the diverse range of host microenvironments colonized by CDT-producing pathogenic bacteria remains to be experimentally explored.

Indexed as

Bacterial ToxinsCell CycleEukaryotic CellsGram-Negative BacteriaProtein BindingProtein TransportBacterial Toxinscytolethal distending toxinbacterial toxinCDTcell cycle arrestcyclomodulincytolethal distending toxingenotoxin

Identifiers

PMID23061054
PMCPMC3465861
OpenAlexW2129214738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.