Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23061015›Full record

ArticleSurgical neurology international2012

Performance of Third-generation FloTrac/Vigileo system during hyperdynamic therapy for delayed cerebral ischemia after subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Tatsushi Mutoh, Tatsuya Ishikawa, Shinya Kobayashi, Akifumi Suzuki, Nobuyuki Yasui

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical neurology international, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01880684 (Validation of Capnography as a Predictor of Cardiac Output Change as Measured by FloTrac), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01880684 completednot on this mapstarted 2013, after this paper: background citation

Validation of Capnography as a Predictor of Cardiac Output Change as Measured by FloTrac

TypeobservationalSponsorMontreal Heart InstituteRan2013 to 2013Enrolled50ConditionsHypovolemia, Cardiac Output, High, Cardiac Output, Low
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tatsushi MutohDepartment of Surgical Neurology, Research Institute for Brain and Blood Vessels-AKITA, 6-10 Senshu-Kubota-Machi, Akita, Japan.
Tatsuya Ishikawa
Shinya Kobayashi
Akifumi Suzuki
Nobuyuki Yasui
Research Institute for Brain and Blood Vessels Akita · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMonitoring of cardiac output (CO) is important for promising safe approach to goal-directed hemodynamic therapy for delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), but is often precluded by the invasiveness and complexity of ongoing monitoring modalities. We examined the clinical utility of less-invasive management using an uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform-derived cardiac output (APCO) monitor with refined algorithm (Third-generation FloTrac/Vigileo, Edwards, Irvine, CA, USA) during hyperdynamic therapy for post-SAH DCI, compared with transpulmonary thermodilution (PiCCO, Pulsion, Munich, Germany) as a reference technique.

methodsForty-five patients who underwent surgical clipping within 24 h of SAH onset and subsequently developed clinical deterioration attributable to DCI were investigated. Validation of the APCO-derived cardiac index (CI) during dobutamine-induced hyperdynamic therapy was compared with a reference CI analyzed by transpulmonary thermodilution in 20 patients. In a subsequent trial of 48 cases, the overall clinical results from patients managed with each device were compared.

resultsThe APCO underestimated CI with an overall bias ± SD of 0.33 ± 0.26 L/min/m(2) compared with transpulmonary thermodilution, resulting in an error of 14.9%. The trends of CI for both techniques at each dobutamine dose were similar (r(2)= 0.77; P < 0.0001). No statistically significant differences were observed between the device groups for frequencies of neurological improvement, cerebral infarction, cardiopulmonary complications, or functional outcomes at 3 months.

conclusionsThese data suggest that the refined APCO tends to underestimate CI compared with reference transpulmonary thermodilution during hyperdynamic therapy with dobutamine for reversing DCI, but may be acceptable in this select category of patients to obtain comparable clinical results.

Indexed as

Cardiac outputhemodynamic monitoringpulse contour analysissubarachnoid hemorrhagetranspulmonary thermodilution

Identifiers

PMID23061015
PMCPMC3463836
OpenAlexW2070665533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.