Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23060680›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied behavior analysis2012

Effects of preference and reinforcer variation on within-session patterns of responding.

Alice A Keyl-Austin, Andrew L Samaha, Sarah E Bloom, Megan A Boyle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied behavior analysis, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alice A Keyl-AustinUtah State University, Logan, Utah, USA.
Andrew L Samaha
Sarah E Bloom
Megan A Boyle

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examined correspondence between preference assessment outcome and within-session patterns of responding in one subject with autism. Responding maintained by a single highly preferred item resulted in a greater total number of responses, a slower decline in within-session response rates, and a greater proportion of short interresponse times compared to responding maintained by varied moderately preferred (MP) stimuli. Presenting varied MP stimuli within the same session produced greater levels and more sustained responding than presenting those same stimuli individually.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorReinforcement, PsychologySeasonsAutistic DisorderChild, PreschoolHumansMaleNeuropsychological TestsPhotic StimulationReproducibility of ResultsTime Factorsautismbehavioral economicsbridge studymarginal utilitypreference assessment

Identifiers

PMID23060680
PMCPMC3469308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.