Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23057749›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of cell and developmental biology2012

Paths less traveled: evo-devo approaches to investigating animal morphological evolution.

Ricardo Mallarino, Arhat Abzhanov

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of cell and developmental biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Evolutionary immunology to explore original antiviral strategies.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Comparative studies on speciation: 30 years since Coyne and Orr.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Mechanisms of bacterial morphogenesis: evolutionary cell biology approaches provide new insights.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2015
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ricardo MallarinoDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA. abzhanov@fas.harvard.edu
Arhat Abzhanov

Funding

Characterization of cranial dermal bone-specific miRNAsR21DE021535 · NIDCR · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI ABZHANOV, ARKHAT · 2011 to 2012
$464k
NIDCR NIH HHS 1R21DE021535-01NIDCR NIH HHS R21 DE021535
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the chief aims of modern biology is to understand the causes and mechanisms of morphological evolution. Multicellular animals display a stunning diversity of shapes and sizes of their bodies and individual suborganismal structures, much of it important to their survival. What is the most efficient way to study the evolution of morphological diversity? The old-new field of evolutionary developmental biology (evo-devo) can be particularly useful for understanding the origins of animal forms, as it aims to consolidate advances from disparate fields such as phylogenetics, genomics, morphometrics, cell biology, and developmental biology. We analyze the structure of some of the most successful recent evo-devo studies, which we see as having three distinct but highly interdependent components: (a) morphometrics, (b) identification of candidate mechanisms, and (c) functional experiments. Our case studies illustrate how multifarious evo-devo approaches taken within the three-winged evo-devo research program explain developmental mechanisms for morphological evolution across different phylogenetic scales.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAdaptation, BiologicalAnimal FinsAnimalsBeakGenetic SpeciationModels, BiologicalMorphogenesisPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID23057749
PMCPMC8845070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.