Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23057551›Full record

ReviewPharmacogenomics2012

Differing clinical impact of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in serous ovarian cancer.

Guoyan Liu, Da Yang, Yan Sun, Ilya Shmulevich, Fengxia Xue, Anil K Sood, Wei Zhang

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacogenomics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effects of BRCA1- and BRCA2-related mutations on ovarian and breast cancer survival: a meta-analysis.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2015
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Emerging Role of Chromatin Remodeling Complexes in Ovarian Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Transcriptome Patterns ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Guoyan LiuDepartment of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Da Yang
Yan Sun
Ilya Shmulevich
Fengxia Xue
Anil K Sood
Wei Zhang
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USInstitute for Systems Biology · USTianjin Medical University · CNTianjin Medical University General Hospital · CN

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON SPORE IN OVARIAN CANCERP50CA083639 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI BAST, ROBERT C · 1999 to 2015
$33.0M
Center for Systems Analysis of the Cancer RegulomeU24CA143835 · NCI · INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY · PI SHMULEVICH, ILYA · 2009 to 2016
$10.6M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA083639NCI NIH HHS U24 CA143835NCI NIH HHS U24CA143835
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A key function of BRCA1 and BRCA2 is the participation in dsDNAbreak repair via homologous recombination. BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, which occur in most hereditary ovarian cancers (OCs) and approximately 10% of all OC cases, are associated with defects in homologous recombination and genomic instability, a phenotype termed 'BRCAness'. The clinical effects of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations have commonly been analyzed together; however, it is becoming increasingly apparent that these mutations do not have the same effects in OC. Recently, three major reports highlighted the unequal clinical characteristics of OCs with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. All studies demonstrated that BRCA2-mutated patients are associated with better survival and therapeutic response than BRCA1-mutated and wild-type patients with serous OC. The differing prognostic effects of the BRCA2 and BRCA1 mutations is likely due to differing roles of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in homologous recombination repair and a stronger association between the BRCA2 mutation and a hypermutator phenotype. These new findings have potentially important implications for clinical management of patients with serous OC.

Indexed as

Genes, BRCA1Genes, BRCA2MutationBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinDNA RepairFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenomic InstabilityHumansOvarian NeoplasmsPrognosisBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID23057551
PMCPMC3603383
OpenAlexW2109584956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.