Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23056882›Full record

ArticleIranian journal of pediatrics2012

Early versus Late Trophic Feeding in Very Low Birth Weight Preterm Infants.

Akram Sallakh-Niknezhad, Fazileh Bashar-Hashemi, Niloofar Satarzadeh, Morteza Ghojazadeh, Golnesa Sahnazarli

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Iranian journal of pediatrics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06883903 (The Effect of Day-Night Cycle on the Transition Time to Full Enteral Feeding in Preterm Newborns Receiving Oropharyngeal Colostrum), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06883903 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Day-Night Cycle on the Transition Time to Full Enteral Feeding in Preterm Newborns Receiving Oropharyngeal Colostrum

TypeinterventionalSponsorBiruni UniversityRan2022 to 2022Enrolled60ConditionsFull Enteral Nutrition, the Day and Night CycleArmsday-night cycle application, routine practice
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Cost-effectiveness of probiotics for necrotizing enterocolitis prevention in very low birth weight infants.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2020
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Akram Sallakh-NiknezhadDepartment of Midwifery, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Fazileh Bashar-Hashemi
Niloofar Satarzadeh
Morteza Ghojazadeh
Golnesa Sahnazarli

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveImproved survival of preterm infants, beneficial effects of trophic feeding and limited data on timing management of enteral feeding for very low birth weight preterm infants requires more researches to determine the exact starting time and increased volumes. This study aims to compare early (<48 h) versus late (>72h) trophic feeding with respect to important neonatal outcomes.

methodsIn a cohort study from September 2007 to October 2008, a total of 170 preterm infants (1000-1500 gram, 26-31 weeks) consisting of 125 who received trophic feeding enterally within the first 48 hours of birth (early group) and 45 fed enterally after 72 h0urs (late group), without major congenital birth defects and severe asphyxia entered the study. Bolus feeding was started in both groups at 1-2 cc/kg every 4-6 hours of human milk or preterm infant formula and was advanced 1-2 cc/kg/day if tolerated along with parenteral nutrition. Feeding intolerance, possibility of necrotizing entrocolitis (NEC), episodes of sepsis, body weight, length of NICU stay, and duration of parenteral nutrition were assessed serially.

findingsThere were no statistically significant differences in the clinical and maternal characteristics of infants in the two groups. The time to gain birth weight (13.75±5.21 vs 20.53±6.31 (P < 0.001)), duration of parenteral nutrition (9.26±4.572 days vs 14.11±6.415 days (P < 0.001)), hospital stay (12.14±8.612 vs 21.11±1.156 (P < 0.001)) were significantly shorter in early compared to late feeding group; none of the two groups experienced a high incidence of late onset sepsis (P = 0.73). There was 1 case of confirmed NEC in every group.

conclusionThe benefits of early trophic feeding shown by this study strongly support its use for the preterm infants without adding to complications.

Indexed as

Parenteral NutritionPreterm InfantTrophic FeedingVery Low Birth Weight Infant

Identifiers

PMID23056882
PMCPMC3446068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.