Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23056633›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Maternal and perinatal outcomes by mode of delivery in senegal and mali: a cross-sectional epidemiological survey.

Valérie Briand, Alexandre Dumont, Michal Abrahamowicz, Amadou Sow, Mamadou Traore, Patrick Rozenberg, Laurence Watier, Pierre Fournier

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Risk factors for adverse outcomes in women with high-risk pregnancy and their neonates, Haiti.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Cesarean section in sub-Saharan Africa.Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology · 2016
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Valérie BriandResearch Institute for Development, UMR, Paris, France. valerie.briand@ird.fr
Alexandre Dumont
Michal Abrahamowicz
Amadou Sow
Mamadou Traore
Patrick Rozenberg
Laurence Watier
Pierre Fournier
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine · CAInstitut Pasteur · FRMali-Folkecenter · MLMcGill University · CAMère et Enfant en Milieu Tropical · FRUniversité de Montréal · CAUniversité de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines · FR

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn the context of rapid changes regarding practices related to delivery in Africa, we assessed maternal and perinatal adverse outcomes associated with the mode of delivery in 41 referral hospitals of Mali and Senegal. STUDY

designCross-sectional survey nested in a randomised cluster trial (1/10/2007-1/10/2008). The associations between intended mode of delivery and (i) in-hospital maternal mortality, (ii) maternal morbidity (transfusion or hysterectomy), (iii) stillbirth or neonatal death before Day 1 and (iv) neonatal death between 24 hours after birth and hospital discharge were examined. We excluded women with immediate life threatening maternal or fetal complication to avoid indication bias. The analyses were performed using hierarchical logistic mixed models with random intercept and were adjusted for women's, newborn's and hospitals' characteristics.

resultsAmong the 78,166 included women, 2.2% had a pre-labor cesarean section (CS) and 97.8% had a trial of labor. Among women with a trial of labor, 87.5% delivered vaginally and 12.5% had intrapartum CS. Pre-labor CS was associated with a marked reduction in the risk of stillbirth or neonatal death before Day 1 as compared with trial of labor (OR = 0.2 [0.16-0.36]), though we did not show that maternal mortality (OR = 0.3 [0.07-1.32]) and neonatal mortality after Day 1 (OR = 1.3 (0.66-2.72]) differed significantly between groups. Among women with trial of labor, intrapartum CS and operative vaginal delivery were associated with higher risks of maternal mortality and morbidity, and neonatal mortality after Day 1, as compared with spontaneous vaginal delivery.

conclusionsIn referral hospitals of Mali and Senegal, pre-labor CS is a safe procedure although intrapartum CS and operative vaginal delivery are associated with increased risks in mothers and infants. Further research is needed to determine what aspects of obstetric care contribute to a delay in the provision of intrapartum interventions so that practices may be made safer when they are needed.

Indexed as

AdultCesarean SectionCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansInfant MortalityInfant, NewbornMaliMaternal MortalityPregnancySenegalYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID23056633
PMCPMC3466276
OpenAlexW1977552353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.