Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23056556›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Genomic diversity of Escherichia isolates from diverse habitats.

Seungdae Oh, Sarah Buddenborg, Deborah R Yoder-Himes, James M Tiedje, Konstantinos T Konstantinidis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Genetic Determinants of Escherichia coli Survival in Beach Sand.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Is It Human or Animal? The Origin of PathogenicTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2021
    Article
  9. Selective survival ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The distribution of bacterial doubling times in the wild.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Seungdae OhSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Sarah Buddenborg
Deborah R Yoder-Himes
James M Tiedje
Konstantinos T Konstantinidis
Michigan State University · USGeorgia Institute of Technology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our understanding of the Escherichia genus is heavily biased toward pathogenic or commensal isolates from human or animal hosts. Recent studies have recovered Escherichia isolates that persist, and even grow, outside these hosts. Although the environmental isolates are typically phylogenetically distinct, they are highly related to and phenotypically indistinguishable from their human counterparts, including for the coliform test. To gain insights into the genomic diversity of Escherichia isolates from diverse habitats, including freshwater, soil, animal, and human sources, we carried out comparative DNA-DNA hybridizations using a multi-genome E. coli DNA microarray. The microarray was validated based on hybridizations with selected strains whose genome sequences were available and used to assess the frequency of microarray false positive and negative signals. Our results showed that human fecal isolates share two sets of genes (n>90) that are rarely found among environmental isolates, including genes presumably important for evading host immune mechanisms (e.g., a multi-drug transporter for acids and antimicrobials) and adhering to epithelial cells (e.g., hemolysin E and fimbrial-like adhesin protein). These results imply that environmental isolates are characterized by decreased ability to colonize host cells relative to human isolates. Our study also provides gene markers that can distinguish human isolates from those of warm-blooded animal and environmental origins, and thus can be used to more reliably assess fecal contamination in natural ecosystems.

Indexed as

EcosystemGenetic VariationAnimalsDNA, BacterialDogsEnvironmental PollutionEscherichiaFecesFresh WaterGastrointestinal TractGenes, BacterialHumansNucleic Acid HybridizationOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPhenotypeSoil MicrobiologyDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID23056556
PMCPMC3466228
OpenAlexW1998753147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.