Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23056288›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2012

ABCB1 C3435T polymorphism and response to clopidogrel treatment in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients: a meta-analysis.

Jia Su, Jin Xu, Xiaojing Li, Han Zhang, Juwei Hu, Renyuan Fang, Xiaomin Chen

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Association ofFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Co-Existence ofBalkan journal of medical genetics : BJMG · 2023
    Article
  10. The Role of Global and Local Ancestry on Clopidogrel Response in African Americans.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Predictive association ofPharmacogenomics · 2021
    Review
  14. Open life sciences · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jia SuDepartment of Cardiology, The Affiliated Ningbo No.1 Hospital, School of Medicine, Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang Province, People's Republic of China.
Jin Xu
Xiaojing Li
Han Zhang
Juwei Hu
Renyuan Fang
Xiaomin Chen
Ningbo University · CNNingbo No.6 Hospital · CNNingbo No. 2 Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA number of investigators have evaluated the association between the ABCB1 polymorphism and clopidogrel responding, but the results have been inconclusive. To examine the risk of high platelet activity and poor clinical outcomes associated with the ABCB1 C3435T polymorphism in CAD patients on clopidogrel, all available studies were included in the present meta-analysis.

methodsWe performed a systematic search of PubMed, Scopus and the Cochrane library database for eligible studies. Articles meeting the inclusion criteria were comprehensively reviewed, and the available data were accumulated by the meta-analysis.

resultsIt was demonstrated that the ABCB1 C3435T variation was associated with the risk of early major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (T vs. C OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.62; P=0.003; TT vs. CC: OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.19 to 2.63; P=0.005; CT + TT vs.CC: OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.06 to 2.06; P=0.02) and the polymorphism was also associated with the risk of the long-term MACE in patients on clopidogrel LD 300 mg (T vs. C: OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.48; P=0.001; TT vs. CC: OR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.19 to 2.13; P=0.002; CT + TT vs.CC: OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.79; P=0.01). The comparison of TT vs. CC was associated with a reduction in the outcome of bleeding (TT vs. CC: OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.66; P<0.00001). However, the association between ABCB1 C3435T polymorphism and platelet activity and other risk of poor clinical outcomes was not significant.

conclusionsThe evidence from our meta-analysis indicated that the ABCB1 C3435T polymorphism might be a risk factor for the MACE in patients on clopidogrel LD 300 mg, and that TT homozygotes decreased the outcome of bleeding compared with CC homozygotes.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, GeneticATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily BATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1ClopidogrelCoronary Artery DiseaseHumansPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsTiclopidineABCB1 protein, humanATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily BATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1ClopidogrelPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsTiclopidine

Identifiers

PMID23056288
PMCPMC3467260
OpenAlexW2063402961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.