ArticleThe journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG2007
Clinical considerations for the pharmacologic management of patent ductus arteriosus with cyclooxygenase inhibitors in premature infants.
Article in The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Treatment of patent ductus arteriosus: indomethacin or ibuprofen?Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2008Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
When medical management is warranted for closure of a persistent patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in premature infants, treatment with a cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitor is indicated. Indomethacin, available since 1976, has been the conventional pharmacologic treatment for PDA, but its use is associated with vasoconstrictive effects that impair renal, mesenteric and cerebral blood flow. Intravenous (IV) ibuprofen lysine, approved in the United States in 2006, has less severe vasoconstrictive effects on these vital organs than IV indomethacin. Clinical trials have shown both of these COX inhibitors to be equally effective in closing the PDA in approximately 70%-80% of treated infants, with less vasoconstrictive and adverse renal effects occurring with IV ibuprofen lysine.1,2 Several clinical considerations are important in the process of medical decision-making when faced with the need for PDA treatment with one of these pharmacologic agents in the premature infant. This paper focuses on these clinical considerations, including cerebral, renal and mesenteric blood flow, renal function, pulmonary effects, protein-binding capacity as it relates to hyperbilirubinemia, and platelet aggregation. No differences in chronic lung disease, pulmonary hypertension, hyperbilirubinemia and coagulopathy were observed in clinical trials when comparing these 2 COX inhibitors; however, significant differences have been observed in arterial blood flow to the cerebral, renal and mesenteric organs, suggesting that IV ibuprofen lysine may be the more favorable agent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.