Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23055510›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2012

Expanding the Ig superfamily code for laminar specificity in retina: expression and role of contactins.

Masahito Yamagata, Joshua R Sanes

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Molecular mechanism of contactin 2 homophilic interaction.Structure (London, England : 1993) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Structure and evolution of neuronal wiring receptors and ligands.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Molecular mechanisms regulating synaptic specificity and retinal circuit formation.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Synaptic recognition molecules in development and disease.Current topics in developmental biology · 2021
    Article
  19. [Intrinsic and extrinsic mechanisms regulating neuronal dendrite morphogenesis].Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2020
    Review
  20. Structure and Functions of Sidekicks.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2020
    Review

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Masahito YamagataDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.
Joshua R Sanes
Harvard University · US

Funding

Synaptic Choices in the Retinotectal SystemR01NS029169 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SANES, JOSHUA R · 1991 to 2012
$6.0M
Synaptic Choices in the Retinotectal SystemR37NS029169 · NINDS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI SANES, JOSHUA R · 2013 to 2019
$4.0M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS029169NINDS NIH HHS R37 NS029169
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bipolar, amacrine, and retinal ganglion cells elaborate arbors and form synapses within the inner plexiform layer (IPL) of the vertebrate retina. Specific subsets of these neuronal types synapse in one or a few of the ≥10 sublaminae of the IPL. Four closely related Ig superfamily transmembrane adhesion molecules--Sidekick1 (Sdk1), Sdk2, Dscam, and DscamL--are expressed by non-overlapping subsets of chick retinal neurons and promote their lamina-specific arborization (Yamagata and Sanes, 2008). Here, we asked whether contactins (Cntns), six homologs of Sdks and Dscams, are expressed by and play roles in other subsets. In situ hybridization showed that cntn1-5 were differentially expressed by subsets of amacrine cells. Immunohistochemistry showed that each Cntn protein was concentrated in a subset of IPL sublaminae. To assess roles of Cntns in retinal development, we focused on Cntn2. Depletion of Cntn2 by RNA interference markedly reduced the ability of Cntn2-positive cells to restrict their arbors to appropriate sublaminae. Conversely, ectopic expression of cntn2 redirected neurites of transduced neurons to the Cntn2-positive sublaminae. Thus, both loss- and gain-of-function strategies implicate Cntn2 in lamina-specific neurite targeting. Studies in heterologous cells showed that Cntn2 mediates homophilic adhesion, but does not bind detectably to Sdks, Dscams, or other Cntns. Overexpression analysis showed that Cntns1 and 3 can also redirect neurites to appropriate sublaminae. We propose that Cntns, Sdks, and Dscams comprise an Ig superfamily code that uses homophilic interactions to promote lamina-specific targeting of retinal dendrites in IPL.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalAnimalsBasement MembraneChickensContactin 2ContactinsFemaleHEK293 CellsHumansImmunoglobulin IdiotypesK562 CellsMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, KnockoutRetinaCntn2 protein, mouseContactin 2ContactinsImmunoglobulin Idiotypes

Identifiers

PMID23055510
PMCPMC3488879
OpenAlexW2024846396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.