Trial reportThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2012
Neural correlates of induced motion perception in the human brain.
Trial report in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anisotropic speed discrimination sensitivity for expanding and contracting optic flow.Journal of vision · 2026Article
- The interaction of speed and time in biasing the perception of dynamically changing visual inputs.Journal of vision · 2026Article
- hMT+ activity predicts the effect of spatial attention on surround suppression.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- Decoding the dynamic perception of risk and speed using naturalistic stimuli: A multivariate, whole-brain analysis.Human brain mapping · 2024Article
- An Illusory Motion in Stationary Stimuli Alters Their Perceived Duration.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Occipital White Matter Tracts in Human and Macaque.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2017Article
- Retinotopic encoding of the Ternus-Pikler display reflected in the early visual areas.Journal of vision · 2016Article
- Computational neuroimaging and population receptive fields.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2015Review
- Cortical correlates of human motion perception biases.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2014Article
- Effect of surrounding texture on the pursuit-pursuing illusion.i-Perception · 2014Article
- The role of human ventral visual cortex in motion perception.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2013Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A physically stationary stimulus surrounded by a moving stimulus appears to move in the opposite direction. There are similarities between the characteristics of this phenomenon of induced motion and surround suppression of directionally selective neurons in the brain. Here, functional magnetic resonance imaging was used to investigate the link between the subjective perception of induced motion and cortical activity. The visual stimuli consisted of a central drifting sinusoid surrounded by a moving random-dot pattern. The change in cortical activity in response to changes in speed and direction of the central stimulus was measured. The human cortical area hMT+ showed the greatest activation when the central stimulus moved at a fast speed in the direction opposite to that of the surround. More importantly, the activity in this area was the lowest when the central stimulus moved in the same direction as the surround and at a speed such that the central stimulus appeared to be stationary. The results indicate that the activity in hMT+ is related to perceived speed modulated by induced motion rather than to physical speed or a kinetic boundary. Early visual areas (V1, V2, V3, and V3A) showed a similar pattern; however, the relationship to perceived speed was not as clear as that in hMT+. These results suggest that hMT+ may be a neural correlate of induced motion perception and play an important role in contrasting motion signals in relation to their surrounding context and adaptively modulating our motion perception depending on the spatial context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.