ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2012
Why do GroEL ions exhibit two gas phase conformers?
Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Determination of Gas-Phase Ion Structures of Locally Polar Homopolymers Through High-Resolution Ion Mobility Spectrometry-Mass Spectrometry.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2019Article
- Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry Differentiates Protein Quaternary Structures Formed in Solution and in Electrospray Droplets.Analytical chemistry · 2015Article
- Surface induced dissociation yields substructure ofInternational journal of mass spectrometry · 2015Article
- Structural analysis of activated SgrAI-DNA oligomers using ion mobility mass spectrometry.Biochemistry · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The reasons for the existence of two gas phase conformers for electrosprayed ions of the large tetradecameric protein complex GroEL are considered. Key features are that: (1) both conformers extrapolate to very similar cross sections in the limit of zero charge; (2) both conformers supercharge above the maximum value permitted by the Rayleigh criterion; and (3) one of the conformers supercharges substantially more than the other. We hypothesize that the supercharging observed is associated to the approximately cylindrical shape of GroEL in aqueous solution, enabling accumulation of extra charge on either one or two of its bases when they intersect the evaporating drop surface. The two conformers would then correspond to cases when either one or the two bases of the cylinder carry extra charge. Apparently, the conformer symmetrically (doubly) supercharged on both ends is Coulombically stretched, therefore exhibiting a mobility different from the conformer asymmetrically supercharged only on one end. Several general consequences follow. First, non-spherical proteins may generally be charged above the usual Rayleigh limit. Second, we confirm the previously advanced but contentious notion that gas phase protein ions are readily compacted or stretched away from their crystal structure by capillary and Coulombic forces during the electrospraying process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23055071What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.