Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23055065›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2012

Pre-adaptations and the evolution of pollination by sexual deception: Cope's rule of specialization revisited.

Nicolas J Vereecken, Carol A Wilson, Susann Hötling, Stefan Schulz, Sergey A Banketov, Patrick Mardulyn

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
12.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Osmophore Structure and Labellum Micromorphology inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Three Chemically Distinct Floral Ecotypes inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Nicolas J VereeckenEvolutionary Biology and Ecology, Free University of Brussels/Université Libre de Bruxelles, Av. F. D. Roosevelt 50 CP 160/12, 1050 Brussels, Belgium. nicolas.vereecken@ulb.ac.be
Carol A Wilson
Susann Hötling
Stefan Schulz
Sergey A Banketov
Patrick Mardulyn
Technische Universität Braunschweig · DEUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BERancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pollination by sexual deception is arguably one of the most unusual liaisons linking plants and insects, and perhaps the most illustrative example of extreme floral specialization in angiosperms. While considerable progress has been made in understanding the floral traits involved in sexual deception, less is known about how this remarkable mimicry system might have arisen, the role of pre-adaptations in promoting its evolution and its extent as a pollination mechanism outside the few groups of plants (primarily orchids) where it has been described to date. In the Euro-Mediterranean region, pollination by sexual deception is traditionally considered to be the hallmark of the orchid genus Ophrys. Here, we introduce two new cases outside of Ophrys, in plant groups dominated by generalized, shelter-mimicking species. On the basis of phylogenetic reconstructions of ancestral pollination strategies, we provide evidence for independent and bidirectional evolutionary transitions between generalized (shelter mimicry) and specialized (sexual deception) pollination strategies in three groups of flowering plants, and suggest that pseudocopulation has evolved from pre-adaptations (floral colours, shapes and odour bouquets) that selectively attract male pollinators through shelter mimicry. These findings, along with comparative analyses of floral traits (colours and scents), shed light on particular phenotypic changes that might have fuelled the parallel evolution of these extraordinary pollination strategies. Collectively, our results provide the first substantive insights into how pollination sexual deception might have evolved in the Euro-Mediterranean region, and demonstrate that even the most extreme cases of pollinator specialization can reverse to more generalized interactions, breaking 'Cope's rule of specialization'.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionPollinationAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsBeesDNA, ChloroplastFlowersInsectaMaleMolecular Sequence DataOrchidaceaePhenotypePhylogenyRNA, Transfer, LeuDNA, ChloroplastRNA, Transfer, Leu

Identifiers

PMID23055065
PMCPMC3497092
OpenAlexW2136576208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.