Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23055061›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2012

The half-life of DNA in bone: measuring decay kinetics in 158 dated fossils.

Morten E Allentoft, Matthew Collins, David Harker, James Haile, Charlotte L Oskam, Marie L Hale, Paula F Campos, Jose A Samaniego, M Thomas P Gilbert, Eske Willerslev and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 191 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
191citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

191 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. A Beginner's Guide for Using Bone in Marine Mammal Research.Integrative and comparative biology · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Ribonucleotide errors, RNase HII, and ribonucleotide excision repair.Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Using sedimentary ancient DNA in coastal and marine contexts to explore past human-environmental interactions in Australia.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  20. Article

131 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Morten E AllentoftAncient DNA Laboratory, School of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Murdoch University, 90 South Street, Perth, Western Australia 6150, Australia. morten.allentoft@gmail.com
Matthew Collins
David Harker
James Haile
Charlotte L Oskam
Marie L Hale
Paula F Campos
Jose A Samaniego
M Thomas P Gilbert
Eske Willerslev
Guojie Zhang
R Paul Scofield
Richard N Holdaway
Michael Bunce

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Claims of extreme survival of DNA have emphasized the need for reliable models of DNA degradation through time. By analysing mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) from 158 radiocarbon-dated bones of the extinct New Zealand moa, we confirm empirically a long-hypothesized exponential decay relationship. The average DNA half-life within this geographically constrained fossil assemblage was estimated to be 521 years for a 242 bp mtDNA sequence, corresponding to a per nucleotide fragmentation rate (k) of 5.50 × 10(-6) per year. With an effective burial temperature of 13.1°C, the rate is almost 400 times slower than predicted from published kinetic data of in vitro DNA depurination at pH 5. Although best described by an exponential model (R(2) = 0.39), considerable sample-to-sample variance in DNA preservation could not be accounted for by geologic age. This variation likely derives from differences in taphonomy and bone diagenesis, which have confounded previous, less spatially constrained attempts to study DNA decay kinetics. Lastly, by calculating DNA fragmentation rates on Illumina HiSeq data, we show that nuclear DNA has degraded at least twice as fast as mtDNA. These results provide a baseline for predicting long-term DNA survival in bone.

Indexed as

FossilsAnimalsBirdsBone and BonesDNA, MitochondrialHalf-LifeHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationKineticsModels, GeneticNew ZealandRadiometric DatingReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionTemperatureDNA, Mitochondrial

Identifiers

PMID23055061
PMCPMC3497090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.