ReviewCurrent osteoporosis reports2012
Co-managed care: the gold standard for geriatric fracture care.
Review in Current osteoporosis reports, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring geriatric trauma unit experiences through patients' eyes: a qualitative study.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
- Increased Geriatric Treatment Frequency Improves Mobility and Secondary Fracture Prevention in Older Adult Hip Fracture Patients-An Observational Cohort Study of 23,828 Patients from the Registry for Geriatric Trauma (ATR-DGU).Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- The role of routine postoperative laboratory tests following hip hemiarthroplasty for an elderly femoral neck fracture.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2021Article
- Design and Evaluation of a Hospital-Based Educational Event on Fracture Care for Older Adult.Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation · 2021Article
- Reducing routine laboratory tests in patients with isolated extremity fractures: a prospective safety and feasibility study in 246 patients.Patient safety in surgery · 2019Article
- [Interdisciplinary management in geriatric trauma surgery : Results of a survey in Austria].Der Unfallchirurg · 2017Article
- [Co-management in geriatric traumatology].Der Orthopade · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With a worldwide aging population, the incidence and consequences of geriatric fractures are assuming an increasing importance to health care providers and institutions. Studies have shown that optimal efficient management ensures the best outcome for the patient, at the least cost to the institution. A review of the recent literature was performed to establish the current best evidence ie, gold standard, for geriatric fracture care. Given the complexities of the subject, randomized controlled trials are difficult and confounded by the multiple medical issues of the population being studied. RCT's are best suited to study individual questions, rather than systems of care. Hence, the importance of peer-reviewed models of care, as well as prospective population registries is established in defining what the gold standard of care should be for this vulnerable population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23054959What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.