Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. A Comprehensive Review on Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Presentation, Pathophysiology and Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
   Review
2. Outcomes of 101 Consecutive Surgical Resections of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours (GEPNETs) at Tata Memorial Hospital: a Referral Bias for Nonfunctional Duodenopancreatic Tumours and the Need for Greater Awareness of GEPNETs as a Distinct Entity.The Indian journal of surgery · 2017
   Article
3. Dual tracer imaging approach in assessing tumor biology and heterogeneity in neuroendocrine tumors: its correlation with tumor proliferation index and possible multifaceted implications for personalized clinical management decisions, with focus on PRRT.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2014
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as