Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23054917›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2013

Determinants of readiness for primary care-mental health integration (PC-MHI) in the VA Health Care System.

Evelyn T Chang, Danielle E Rose, Elizabeth M Yano, Kenneth B Wells, Maureen E Metzger, Edward P Post, Martin L Lee, Lisa V Rubenstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Mental Health Integration in Geriatric Patient-Aligned Care Teams in the Department of Veterans Affairs.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2019
    Observational
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Measurement of Common Mental Health Conditions in VHA Co-located, Collaborative Care.Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings · 2016
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Evelyn T ChangVA Greater Los Angeles, General Internal Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA. evelyn.chang@va.gov
Danielle E Rose
Elizabeth M Yano
Kenneth B Wells
Maureen E Metzger
Edward P Post
Martin L Lee
Lisa V Rubenstein

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDepression management can be challenging for primary care (PC) settings. While several evidence-based models exist for depression care, little is known about the relationships between PC practice characteristics, model characteristics, and the practice's choices regarding model adoption.

objectiveWe examined three Veterans Affairs (VA)-endorsed depression care models and tested the relationships between theoretically-anchored measures of organizational readiness and implementation of the models in VA PC clinics.

design1) Qualitative assessment of the three VA-endorsed depression care models, 2) Cross-sectional survey of leaders from 225 VA medium-to-large PC practices, both in 2007. MAIN MEASURES: We assessed PC readiness factors related to resource adequacy, motivation for change, staff attributes, and organizational climate. As outcomes, we measured implementation of one of the VA-endorsed models: collocation, Translating Initiatives in Depression into Effective Solutions (TIDES), and Behavioral Health Lab (BHL). We performed bivariate and, when possible, multivariate analyses of readiness factors for each model. KEY

resultsCollocation is a relatively simple arrangement with a mental health specialist physically located in PC. TIDES and BHL are more complex; they use standardized assessments and care management based on evidence-based collaborative care principles, but with different organizational requirements. By 2007, 107 (47.5 %) clinics had implemented collocation, 39 (17.3 %) TIDES, and 17 (7.6 %) BHL. Having established quality improvement processes (OR 2.30, [1.36, 3.87], p = 0.002) or a depression clinician champion (OR 2.36, [1.14, 4.88], p = 0.02) was associated with collocation. Being located in a VA regional network that endorsed TIDES (OR 8.42, [3.69, 19.26], p < 0.001) was associated with TIDES implementation. The presence of psychologists or psychiatrists on PC staff, greater financial sufficiency, or greater spatial sufficiency was associated with BHL implementation.

conclusionsBoth readiness factors and characteristics of depression care models influence model adoption. Greater model simplicity may make collocation attractive within local quality improvement efforts. Dissemination through regional networks may be effective for more complex models such as TIDES.

Indexed as

Cross-Sectional StudiesDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedDepressionHealth Care ReformHumansMental Health ServicesModels, OrganizationalMotivationPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchQuality ImprovementUnited StatesVeterans Health

Identifiers

PMID23054917
PMCPMC3579970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.