Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23054894›Full record

ReviewCurrent hypertension reports2012

Blood pressure j-curve: current concepts.

Maciej Banach, Wilbert S Aronow

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current hypertension reports, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Blood pressure and in-hospital outcomes in patients hospitalized with atrial fibrillation: findings from the CCC-AF project.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Effect of different blood pressure levels on short-term outcomes in hospitalized heart failure patients.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Diabetes Mellitus and Hypertension-A Case of Sugar and Salt?International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Unsolved Problem: (Isolated) Systolic Hypertension with Diastolic Blood Pressure below the Safety Margin.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maciej BanachDepartment of Hypertension, Chair of Nephrology and Hypertension, Medical University of Lodz, Poland. maciejbanach@aol.co.uk
Wilbert S Aronow
Medical University of Lodz · PLNew York Medical College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The blood pressure (BP) J-curve debate started in 1979, and we still cannot definitively answer all the questions. However, available studies of antihypertensive treatment provide strong evidence for J-shaped relationships between both diastolic and systolic BP and main outcomes in the general population of hypertensive patients, as well as in high-risk populations, including subjects with coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus, left ventricular hypertrophy, and elderly patients. However, further studies are still necessary in order to clarify this issue. This is connected to the fact that most available studies were observational, and randomized trials did not have or lost their statistical power and were inconclusive. Perhaps only the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) and Optimal Blood Pressure and Cholesterol Targets for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Hypertensives (ESH-CHL-SHOT) will be able to finally answer all the questions. According to the current state of knowledge, it seems reasonable to suggest lowering BP to values within the 130-139/80-85 mmHg range, possibly close to the lower values in this range, in all hypertensive patients and to be very careful with further BP level reductions, especially in high-risk hypertensive patients.

Indexed as

HypertensionAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureDiastoleHumansPatient SelectionRisk FactorsSystoleAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID23054894
PMCPMC3490060
OpenAlexW2060068609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.