Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23054810›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2014

Cortical dendritic spine heads are not electrically isolated by the spine neck from membrane potential signals in parent dendrites.

Marko A Popovic, Xin Gao, Nicholas T Carnevale, Dejan Zecevic

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Optical Studies of Action Potential Dynamics with hVOS probes.Current opinion in biomedical engineering · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Marko A PopovicDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Physiology.
Xin Gao
Nicholas T Carnevale
Dejan Zecevic
Cellular Research (United States) · USInstitute of Neurobiology · BGYale University · US

Funding

COMPUTER METHODS FOR PHYSIOLOGICAL PROBLEMSR01NS011613 · NINDS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MICHAEL L HINES, Robert A. McDougal · 1985 to 2026
$10.4M
SenseLab: Integration of Multidisciplinary Sensory DataR01DC009977 · NIDCD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI HINES, MICHAEL L, MCDOUGAL, ROBERT A. · 2009 to 2018
$6.7M
Voltage-sensitive dye imaging from the nervous systemR01NS068407 · NINDS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI ZECEVIC, DEJAN P · 2009 to 2012
$1.4M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009977NINDS NIH HHS NS068407NINDS NIH HHS NS11613NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS011613
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evidence for an important hypothesis that cortical spine morphology might participate in modifying synaptic efficacy that underlies plasticity and possibly learning and memory mechanisms is inconclusive. Both theory and experiments suggest that the transfer of excitatory postsynaptic potential signals from spines to parent dendrites depends on the spine neck morphology and resistance. Furthermore, modeling of signal transfer in the opposite direction predicts that synapses on spine heads are not electrically isolated from voltages in the parent dendrite. In sharp contrast to this theoretical prediction, one of a very few measurements of electrical signals from spines reported that slow hyperpolarizing membrane potential changes are attenuated considerably by the spine neck as they spread from dendrites to synapses on spine heads. This result challenges our understanding of the electrical behavior of spines at a fundamental level. To re-examine the specific question of the transfer of dendritic signals to synapses of spines, we took advantage of a high-sensitivity Vm-imaging technique and carried out optical measurements of electrical signals from 4 groups of spines with different neck length and simultaneously from parent dendrites. The results show that spine neck does not filter membrane potential signals as they spread from the dendrites into the spine heads.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsCerebral CortexComputer SimulationDendritesDendritic SpinesIn Vitro TechniquesMembrane PotentialsMiceModels, NeurologicalOptical ImagingPatch-Clamp TechniquesPyramidal CellsSomatosensory CortexSynapsesTime Factorscerebral cortexcortical spinesoptical recordingplasticityvoltage-sensitive dyes

Identifiers

PMID23054810
PMCPMC3888368
OpenAlexW2131175607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.