Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23054498›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2013

Evaluating the Serbian version of the KIDSCREEN quality-of-life questionnaires: reliability, validity, and agreement between children's and parents' ratings.

Dejan Stevanovic, Ivana Tadic, Tanja Novakovic, Darija Kisic-Tepavcevic, Ulrike Ravens-Sieberer

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Psychometric properties of the Mandarin Chinese version of the KIDSCREEN-52 health-related quality of life questionnaire in adolescents: a cross-sectional study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A cross-cultural study to assess measurement invariance of the KIDSCREEN-27 questionnaire across Serbian and Iranian children and adolescents.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2015
    Article
  16. Psychometric properties of KIDSCREEN health-related quality of life questionnaire in Iranian adolescents.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dejan StevanovicDepartment of Psychiatry, General Hospital Sombor, Apatinski put 38, 25000, Sombor, Serbia. dejanstevanovic@eunet.rs
Ivana Tadic
Tanja Novakovic
Darija Kisic-Tepavcevic
Ulrike Ravens-Sieberer

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the psychometric properties of the Serbian set of the KIDSCREEN questionnaires: KIDSCREEN-52, KIDSCREEN-27, and KIDSCREEN-10 index.

methodsThe study included 330 children (8-18 years) and 314 parents. All completed the KIDSCREEN and KINDL questionnaires. Psychometric analyses included internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's coefficient), criterion, convergent and discriminant validity, and agreement between children and parents (the intraclass correlation coefficient-ICC).

resultsCronbach's α of 0.7 and above was found for all except for the self-perception scale of the KIDSCREEN-52, being 0.58 for the child and 0.63 for the parent version. Correlations between similar scales in the KIDSCREEN and KINDL were substantial (ranging 0.45-65) and higher than correlations between theoretically different scales. Moderate to excellent agreement existed between children's and parents' ratings in all KIDSCREEN scales (ICC ranged 0.44-0.63), except for the moods and emotions from the longer (ICC = 0.34) and the social support and peers from the shorter version (ICC = 0.38).

conclusionsLevels of internal consistency reliability and validity of all KIDSCREEN questionnaires in Serbian are appropriate, as well as agreement between children's and parents' ratings.

Indexed as

ParentsSurveys and QuestionnairesAdolescentAdultChildFemaleHealth StatusHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSelf ConceptSerbiaSocial Support

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.