Trial reportJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2013
Identifying, monitoring and reducing preventable major bleeds in the hospital setting.
Trial report in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Overcoming inertia in anticoagulant reversal: the current evidence gap and need for critical assessment of factor replacement strategies.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Standardized warfarin monitoring decreases adverse drug reactions.BMC family practice · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent literature describes methods to reduce "preventable" hospital-acquired venous thromboembolism; however, there is a paucity of data on "preventable" bleeding. While risk assessment models exist for both thrombosis and bleeding, these concepts should be differentiated from whether the event was preventable or non-preventable. Here we describe a protocol to identify, monitor, and evaluate anticoagulation-related preventable hospital-acquired major bleeds (PHAMB). This single-center, prospective observational study with retrospective chart review was conducted in 2009 and 2010 to identify anticoagulation-related major bleeding. Eligible anticoagulation-related hospital-acquired major bleeds (HAMB) were further classified as "preventable" or "non-preventable". A total of 229 major bleed episodes were identified of which 188 were excluded due to being community-acquired or non-anticoagulation related major bleeds. Over the 2 year period, five of the 41 HAMB were classified as preventable providing a total incidence of 13 % PHAMB. Three and two of the PHAMB were due to inappropriate dosing and administration of an anticoagulant when contraindications existed, respectively. PHAMB rates decreased from 0.06 in 2009 to 0.04 per 1000 patient days in 2010 (p = 0.62) although this difference was not statistically significant. Raw incidence utilizing Joint Commission methodology demonstrated a 16.7 % rate in 2009 and an 8.7 % rate in 2010. In hospitalized patients, intervention programs may minimize the incidence of anticoagulation-related PHAMB and may maintain similar rates of preventable bleeding over time. Similar programs should be explored prospectively on a larger scale to reduce harm from anticoagulants in the hospital setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23054465What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.