ReviewInternal and emergency medicine2012
Noninvasive ventilation for acute respiratory failure: a review of the literature and current guidelines.
Review in Internal and emergency medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04507802 (Comparison of The Clinical Outcomes of Non-Invasive Ventilation by Helmet vs Facemask in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison of The Clinical Outcomes of Non-Invasive Ventilation by Helmet vs Facemask in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors affecting abnormal triggering with non-invasive ventilators: A before-and-after study.The clinical respiratory journal · 2022Article
- Article
- Oxidative stress management during non-invasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure.Internal and emergency medicine · 2018Article
- IL-8 predicts early mortality in patients with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure treated with noninvasive positive pressure ventilation.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2017Article
- Pathophysiological Basis of Acute Respiratory Failure on Non-Invasive Mechanical Ventilation.The open respiratory medicine journal · 2015Article
- Non-invasive ventilation in prehospital settings.Internal and emergency medicine · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Noninvasive ventilation, both continuous positive airway pressure and noninvasive positive pressure ventilation, has been used increasingly for acute respiratory failure over the past several years. Noninvasive ventilation has been proven to be beneficial for some causes of acute respiratory failure, most clearly for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, while its use in other forms of acute respiratory failure remains more controversial. In this article, the evidence for the use of noninvasive ventilation in various kinds of acute respiratory failure will be examined. Particular attention will be paid to the clinical situations commonly encountered by emergency medicine and general internal medicine clinicians. The potential dangers of noninvasive ventilation as well as some guidelines for clinical decision making when treating patients with this mode of ventilator support will also be discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23054404What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.