Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23054214›Full record

ArticleFamilial cancer2013

Prospective enteroscopic evaluation of jejunal polyposis in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and advanced duodenal polyposis.

Y A Alderlieste, E A J Rauws, E M H Mathus-Vliegen, P Fockens, E Dekker

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Familial cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Impact of enteroscopy on diagnosis and management of small bowel tumors.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Molecular Aberrations in Periampullary Carcinoma.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Y A AlderliesteDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. y.a.alderlieste@amc.uva.nl
E A J Rauws
E M H Mathus-Vliegen
P Fockens
E Dekker
Academic Medical Center · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Duodenal cancer originating from duodenal adenomas is an important cause of death in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Small intestinal adenomas also occur distal to the duodenum, and literature suggests that they mainly occur in the proximal jejunum in patients with severe duodenal polyp burden. We recently reported on 3 FAP-patients with a jejunal adenocarcinoma, all also harbouring advanced duodenal polyposis. Therefore we questioned whether FAP patients should also be submitted to endoscopic surveillance of the jejunum. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and burden of jejunal adenomas in patients with FAP and advanced duodenal disease. All patients with FAP and advanced duodenal polyposis (Spigelman stage IV) at our academic centre were invited to undergo antegrade single balloon enteroscopy (Olympus SIF-Q180) with propofol-sedation. Patient characteristics, procedural characteristics (success, depth of insertion) and enteroscopic findings (number, size and pathology) are described. We identified 18 patients with FAP and duodenal polyposis Spigelman stage IV. Thirteen participated in the study with a mean age of 54 (30-64) years. SBE was successfully performed in 10 patients, with a mean depth of insertion of 72 cm beyond the ligament of Treitz. Adenomatous polyps were detected in 9 patients. Only one of them had extensive polyposis beyond Treitz, with large polyps covering up to one-third of the jejunal circumference. No cancers or adenomas with high-grade dysplasia were detected. Clinically significant jejunal polyposis in FAP is rare, even in high-risk patients with advanced duodenal disease. Routine jejunoscopy does not seem warranted in patients with FAP.

Indexed as

AdenomaAdenomatous Polyposis ColiAdultColorectal NeoplasmsDuodenal NeoplasmsDuodenumEndoscopy, GastrointestinalFemaleHumansIncidenceJejunal NeoplasmsJejunumMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID23054214
OpenAlexW2045324194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.