Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23053686›Full record

Trial reportClinical rheumatology2013

Accelerated infusion rates of rituximab are well tolerated and safe in rheumatology practice: a single-centre experience.

Meryem Can, Fatma Alibaz-Öner, Sibel Yılmaz-Öner, Pamir Atagündüz, Nevsun İnanç, Haner Direskeneli

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical rheumatology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Rituximab for rheumatoid arthritis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Implementation and Evaluation of a 90-Minute Rituximab Infusion Protocol at the Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Rituximab for Rheumatoid Arthritis.Rheumatology and therapy · 2015
    Review
  10. Article
  11. A Retrospective Study on Infusion-Related Reactions to Rituximab in a Heterogeneous Pediatric Population.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Meryem CanSchool of Medicine, Deparment of Rheumatology, Pendik Training and Research Hospital, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey. meryemkrk@gmail.com
Fatma Alibaz-Öner
Sibel Yılmaz-Öner
Pamir Atagündüz
Nevsun İnanç
Haner Direskeneli
Marmara University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the possible risk of infusion reactions of rituximab (RTX), a slow infusion rate (total infusion time, 255 min) is suggested for rheumatological use. However, especially in oncology field, accelerated infusion of RTX is reported to be well tolerated and safe. The aim of our study was to evaluate whether accelerated infusion rates of RTX would similarly be safe and tolerable in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients and other off-label rheumatological indications. All patients treated with RTX for RA and other autoimmune diseases between May 2011 and January 2012 were recruited to the study. Each treatment course consisted of two RTX 1,000 mg infusions, 2 weeks apart. Total time of the infusion for the first cycle was 255 min. Second and subsequent infusions were administered over 120 min as follows: 0-30 min, 100 mg; 30-60 min, 200 mg; 60-90 min, 300 mg; and 90-120 min, 400 mg. The Clinical Trials Classification of Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.3 was used to categorise side effects. The study population comprised 68 patients [F/M, 59:9; mean age, 52.4 (10.6) years]: 60 with RA, 4 with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), 1 with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with SLE and 3 with vasculitis. A total of 77 fast infusions were administered. Eleven patients (16.2 %) had taken a fast infusion at the first course. A total of nine patients experienced at least one AE. Seven patients had a reaction on the first infusion (infusion-related reaction (IRR)), two patients on the second infusion and one patient on both infusions. When graded from 1 to 5 according to CTCAE v. 4.3, grade 1 IRRs were observed in a total of seven patients and grade 2 IRR in three patients. In this study of fast infusions, adverse events after RTX were mostly mild and seem to be well tolerated. Faster rituximab infusion times seem to be safe and might be incorporated into routine practice.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousLupus Erythematosus, SystemicMaleMiddle AgedRheumatologyRituximabTime FactorsVasculitisAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedAntirheumatic AgentsRituximab

Identifiers

PMID23053686
OpenAlexW1967735194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.