ArticlePlanta2013
Genetic characterization and barcoding of taxa in the genus Wolffia Horkel ex Schleid. (Lemnaceae) as revealed by two plastidic markers and amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP).
Article in Planta, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring Duckweed Diversity at the Dawn of Its Cultivation Era: The Invaluable Legacy of the Landolt Collection.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Structural and functional properties of bacterial communities associated with rootless duckweed (Wolffia globosa) and their effect on the Wolffia growth.Environmental microbiome · 2025Article
- Diversity and Differentiation of Duckweed Species from Israel.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Biodiversity of Duckweed (Lemnaceae) in Water Reservoirs of Ukraine and China Assessed by Chloroplast DNA Barcoding.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Intraspecific Diversity in Aquatic Ecosystems: Comparison betweenPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Morphological Characterization and DNA Barcoding of Duckweed Species in Saudi Arabia.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Return of the Lemnaceae: duckweed as a model plant system in the genomics and postgenomics era.The Plant cell · 2021Article
- The World Smallest Plants (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Variation in genome size, cell and nucleus volume, chromosome number and rDNA loci among duckweeds.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Sequence-guided approach to genotyping plant clones and species using polymorphic NB-ARC-related genes.Plant molecular biology · 2018Article
- Nutritional Value of the Duckweed Species of the GenusFrontiers in chemistry · 2018Article
- Genetic structure of duckweed population of Spirodela, Landoltia and Lemna from Lake Tai, China.Planta · 2014Article
- Comparative transcriptome analysis to investigate the high starch accumulation of duckweed (Landoltia punctata) under nutrient starvation.Biotechnology for biofuels · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The genus Wolffia of the duckweed family (Lemnaceae) contains the smallest flowering plants. Presently, 11 species are recognized and categorized mainly on the basis of morphology. Because of extreme reduction of structure of all species, molecular methods are especially required for barcoding and identification of species and clones of this genus. We applied AFLP combined with Bayesian analysis of population structure to 66 clones covering all 11 species. Nine clusters were identified: (1) W. angusta and W. microscopica (only one clone), (2) W. arrhiza, (3) W. cylindracea (except one clone that might be a transition form), (4) W. australiana, (5) W. globosa, (6) W. globosa, W. neglecta, and W. borealis, (7) W. brasiliensis, and W. columbiana, (8) W. columbiana, (9) W. elongata. Furthermore, we investigated the sequences of plastidic regions rps16 (54 clones) and rpl16 (55 clones), and identified the following species: W. angusta, W. australiana, W. brasiliensis, W. cylindracea, W. elongata, W. microscopica, and W. neglecta. Wolffia globosa has been separated into two groups by both methods. One group which consists only of clones from North America and East Asia was labelled here "typical W. globosa". The other group of W. globosa, termed operationally "W. neglecta", contains also clones of W. neglecta and shows high similarity to W. borealis. None of the methods recognized W. borealis as a distinct species. Although each clone could be characterized individually by AFLP and plastidic sequences, and most species could be bar-coded, the presently available data are not sufficient to identify all taxa of Wolffia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23053544What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.