Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23053398›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2013

Japanese structure survey of radiation oncology in 2009 with special reference to designated cancer care hospitals.

Hodaka Numasaki, Masamichi Nishio, Hiroshi Ikeda, Kenji Sekiguchi, Norihiko Kamikonya, Masahiko Koizumi, Masao Tago, Yutaka Ando, Nobuhiro Tsukamoto, Atsuro Terahara and 6 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Hodaka NumasakiDepartment of Medical Physics and Engineering, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-7, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Masamichi Nishio
Hiroshi Ikeda
Kenji Sekiguchi
Norihiko Kamikonya
Masahiko Koizumi
Masao Tago
Yutaka Ando
Nobuhiro Tsukamoto
Atsuro Terahara
Katsumasa Nakamura
Tetsuo Nishimura
Masao Murakami
Mitsuhiro Takahashi
Teruki Teshima
Japanese Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Database Committee

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe structure of radiation oncology in designated cancer care hospitals in Japan was surveyed in terms of equipment, personnel, patient load, and geographic distribution, and compared with the structure in other radiotherapy facilities and the previous survey.

methodsThe Japanese Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology surveyed the national structure of radiation oncology in 2009. The structures of 365 designated cancer care hospitals and 335 other radiotherapy facilities were compared.

resultsDesignated cancer care hospitals accounted for 50.0% of all the radiotherapy facilities in Japan. The patterns of equipment and personnel in designated cancer care hospitals and the other radiotherapy facilities were, respectively, as follows: linear accelerators per facility: 1.4 and 1.0; dual-energy function: 78.6 and 61.3%; three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy function: 88.5 and 70.0%; intensity-modulated radiotherapy function: 51.6 and 25.3%; annual number of patients per linear accelerator: 301.3 and 185.2; Ir-192 remote-controlled after-loading systems: 31.8 and 4.2%; and average number of full-time equivalent radiation oncologists per facility: 1.8 and 0.8. Compared with the previous survey, the ownership ratio of equipment and personnel improved in both designated cancer care hospitals and the other radiotherapy facilities. Annual patient loads per full-time equivalent radiation oncologist in the designated cancer care hospitals and the other radiotherapy facilities were 225.5 and 247.6, respectively. These values exceeded the standard guidelines level of 200.

conclusionsThe structure of radiation oncology in designated Japanese cancer care hospitals was more mature than that in the other radiotherapy facilities. There is still a shortage of personnel. The serious understaffing problem in radiation oncology should be corrected in the future.

Indexed as

Cancer Care FacilitiesHealth Care SurveysRadiation OncologyHospitalsHumansJapanNeoplasmsRadiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.