Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23052847›Full record

ArticleDer Orthopade2012

[Instrumented gait and movement analysis of musculoskeletal diseases].

K Sander, D Rosenbaum, H Böhm, F Layher, T Lindner, R Wegener, S I Wolf, F Seehaus

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Orthopade, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. [Clinical value of instrumental gait analysis].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

K SanderAbt. Biomechanik, Lehrstuhl für Orthopädie des Universitätsklinikums Jena, Waldkrankenhaus Rudolf Elle GmbH, Klosterlausnitzer Str. 81, 07607, Eisenberg, Deutschland. k.sander@krankenhaus-eisenberg.de
D Rosenbaum
H Böhm
F Layher
T Lindner
R Wegener
S I Wolf
F Seehaus

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Instrumented 3-dimensional gait analysis is increasingly being used for the evaluation of movement disorders in orthopedic and neurological musculoskeletal diseases. Due to the high reliability of the measurements the procedures are appropriate for diagnostic purposes as well as for outcome assessment after conservative or surgical interventions. Contrary to conventional clinical assessments gait analysis parameters are able to demonstrate a normal physiological gait pattern that can be achieved with improved kinematic and kinetic parameters. For a suitable application in clinically relevant problems the limitations of the procedures should be taken into account. Due to the high instrumental involvement combined with time and cost expenditure instrumented gait analysis will probably not develop to a clinical routine procedure. Nevertheless, an excellent set of information for answering clinical questions is provided. The present contribution presents selected measurement procedures and technologies and illustrates the wide variety of possibilities with the use of selected clinical examples.

Indexed as

ActigraphyEquipment DesignGait Disorders, NeurologicHumansMonitoring, AmbulatoryMusculoskeletal Diseases

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.