Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23052785›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2013

Distribution of Cryptosporidium oocysts and Giardia cysts in water above and below the normal limit of detection.

Jerry E Ongerth, Frhat M A Saaed

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Fine-Scale Spatial Heterogeneity in the Distribution of Waterborne Protozoa in a Drinking Water Reservoir.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2015
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jerry E OngerthCivil, Mining and Environmental Engineering, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia. jongerth@uow.edu.au
Frhat M A Saaed
University of Wollongong · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analysis of water samples for Cryptosporidium oocysts and Giardia cysts is a specialised and demanding pursuit. Understanding and evaluating data resulting from such analyses is equally specialised and complicated by the most common result--not finding any of the target organisms. Coming to an accurate conclusion regarding such monitoring results has been hampered by a lack of pertinent information presented in the context of current monitoring requirements. The work reported here presents laboratory data demonstrating an appropriate skewed distribution model statistical framework. It is shown that the Poisson model provides for understanding how Cryptosporidium oocysts and Giardia cysts are distributed in water at typical ambient concentrations that are near or most commonly below the limit of detection of the most widely used analytical procedure, USEPA Method 1623. From three to six replicate 50-L volumes of particle-free water were seeded with Cryptosporidium oocysts and Giardia cysts each at concentrations of ca. 0.2/L, 1-2/L, and 6-8/L. The seeded 50-L volumes were analysed in five 10-L aliquots to determine the number of oocysts and cysts in each. The data conformed to the Poisson distribution. This supports the interpretation that analysis of 10-L surface water samples resulting in not finding any target organisms is the result of their presence below the limit of detection. This interpretation strongly suggests that analysing fewer larger volume samples would provide more useful information.

Indexed as

OocystsCryptosporidiumGiardiaLimit of DetectionParasite LoadTemperatureWaterWater

Identifiers

PMID23052785
OpenAlexW2057775640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.