Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23052568›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2013

Cholinergic modulation of auditory processing, sensory gating and novelty detection in human participants.

Inge Klinkenberg, Arjan Blokland, Wim J Riedel, Anke Sambeth

Open access · greenAbstract readControlled Clinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Cholinergic modulation of sensory perception and plasticity.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Sensory reinforcement-enhancing effects of nicotine via smoking.Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology · 2014
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Inge KlinkenbergFaculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Department of Neuropsychology and Psychopharmacology, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands. i.klinkenberg@alumni.maastrichtuniversity.nl
Arjan Blokland
Wim J Riedel
Anke Sambeth
Maastricht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleSuppression of redundant auditory information and facilitation of deviant, novel, or salient sounds can be assessed with paired-click and oddball tasks, respectively. Electrophysiological correlates of perturbed auditory processing found in these paradigms are likely to be a trait marker or candidate endophenotype for schizophrenia.

objectiveThis is the first study to investigate the effects of the muscarinic M1 antagonist biperiden and the cholinesterase inhibitor rivastigmine on auditory-evoked potentials (AEPs), sensory gating, and mismatch negativity (MMN) in young, healthy volunteers.

resultsBiperiden increased P50 amplitude and prolonged N100 and P200 latency in the paired-click task but did not affect sensory gating. Rivastigmine was able to reverse the effects of biperiden on N100 and P200 latency. Biperiden increased P50 latency in the novelty oddball task, which was reversed by concurrent administration of rivastigmine. Rivastigmine shortened N100 latency and enhanced P3a amplitude in the novelty oddball paradigm, both of which were reversed by biperiden.

conclusionThe muscarinic M1 receptor appears to be involved in preattentive processing of auditory information in the paired-click task. Additional effects of biperiden versus rivastigmine were reversed by a combination treatment, which renders attribution of these findings to muscarinic M1 versus muscarinic M2-M5 or nicotinic receptors much more difficult. It remains to be seen whether the effects of cholinergic drugs on AEPs are specifically related to the abnormalities found in schizophrenia. Alternatively, aberrant auditory processing could also be indicative of a general disturbance in neural functioning shared by several neuropsychiatric disorders and/or neurodegenerative changes seen in aging.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAdolescentAdultAuditory PerceptionBiperidenCholinergic AgentsCholinesterase InhibitorsCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodElectroencephalographyEvoked Potentials, AuditoryFemaleHumansMaleMuscarinic AntagonistsPhenylcarbamatesBiperidenCholinergic AgentsCholinesterase InhibitorsMuscarinic AntagonistsPhenylcarbamatesRivastigmine

Identifiers

PMID23052568
OpenAlexW2157607329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.