Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23052414›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2013

Wide intra- and inter-country variability in drug use and dosage in very-low-birth-weight newborns with severe infections.

Chiara Pandolfini, Florentia Kaguelidou, Marco Sequi, Evelyne Jacqz-Aigrain, Imti Choonara, Mark A Turner, Paolo Manzoni, Maurizio Bonati

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Chiara PandolfiniLaboratory for Mother and Child Health, Department of Public Health "Mario Negri" Pharmacological Research Institute, Via Giuseppe la Masa 19, 20156 Milan, Italy. pandolfini@marionegri.it
Florentia Kaguelidou
Marco Sequi
Evelyne Jacqz-Aigrain
Imti Choonara
Mark A Turner
Paolo Manzoni
Maurizio Bonati
Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research · ITDélégation Paris 7 · FROspedale Regina Margherita · ITUniversité Paris Cité · FRUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo describe the use of ciprofloxacin and fluconazole for the treatment of sepsis in European neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in order to better orient research aimed at acquiring essential knowledge in this critical area.

methodsThe survey consisted of an online questionnaire for all participating NICUs on treatment schemes employed, rationales behind drug choices and interest in participation in research involving the two drugs.

resultsA total of 189 level II and III NICUs participated in the survey, representing 25 countries, with Italy, UK and France providing the greatest number of centres (54 % of total). Ciprofloxacin is used in 25 % of NICUs that responded, although the indications for administering it vary between centres and the dosage ranges vary considerably, with 25 % of NICUs giving ≤10 mg/kg/day and another 25 % giving ≥21 mg/kg/day. Factors given as affecting the decision to use ciprofloxacin are uncertainty about its safety and pharmacokinetics and level of penetration in the cerebrospinal fluid. Among the 70 % of responding units that use fluconazole to treat fungal infection, 45 % administer 6 mg/kg unit doses while 33 % administer 12 mg/kg; 41 % of NICUs use a 24-h interval between administrations while 20 % wait 72 h. Among the responding NICUs, 57 % were willing to participate in a project on ciprofloxacin and 59 % would consider participating in a randomized controlled trial evaluating fluconazole versus micafungin.

conclusionsGreat variability in therapies exists within and between countries. Numerous centres are interested in participating in research on these drugs, highlighting the need for further knowledge on sepsis treatment and European centres' interest in off-patent medicine research.

Indexed as

Infant, Very Low Birth WeightAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntifungal AgentsCiprofloxacinDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug UtilizationEuropeFluconazoleHealth Care SurveysHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalPractice Guidelines as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'SepsisAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntifungal AgentsCiprofloxacinFluconazole

Identifiers

PMID23052414
PMCPMC3621995
OpenAlexW2098733134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.