ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2013
Agreement among four drug information sources for the occurrence of warfarin drug interactions in Brazilian heart disease patients with a high prevalence of Trypanosoma cruzi infection.
Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study was to assess the agreement of four renowned interaction lists on potentially severe warfarin drug interactions (DI) in outpatients at a university hospital in Brazil, specifically in subgroups of Trypanosoma cruzi-infected and non-infected patients and those with previous bleeding episodes.
methodsThis was a cross-sectional study in which adult outpatients with heart disease and indications for chronic warfarin use were enrolled. The occurrence of potentially severe warfarin DI was evaluated based on the lists provided by three compendia, i.e., Drug Interaction Facts (DIF), Drug Interactions: Analysis and Management (DIAM) and DRUG-REAX, and by the World Health Organization (WHO) Model Formulary. A kappa coefficient was used to calculate the agreement among the sources.
resultsA total of 280 patients were studied. Most patients were female (54.6 %) with an average age of 56.8 (standard deviation 13.1) years. The agreement among the four sources was fair (Fleiss' kappa coefficient = 0.295). T. cruzi-infected individuals were less likely to have severe warfarin DI than non-infected patients (p < 0.05 for DIAM, DRUG-REAX and the WHO Model Formulary). Potentially severe DI were more frequent in patients with previous bleeding episodes, based on the DIF compendia (p = 0.007).
conclusionsThis evaluation of warfarin DI revealed that the disagreement between compendia is also observed in clinical practice. T. cruzi infection is associated with a lower prevalence of potentially severe warfarin DI, but with a wider variation in its detection. Our results suggest a wide spectrum of discrepancies in detecting heart disease patients at higher risk for severe warfarin DI and a possible heterogeneity in clinical guidance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23052411What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.