Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23052313›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical microbiology2012

Is Streptococcus pyogenes resistant or susceptible to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole?

Asha C Bowen, Rachael A Lilliebridge, Steven Y C Tong, Robert W Baird, Peter Ward, Malcolm I McDonald, Bart J Currie, Jonathan R Carapetis

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. A Randomized Trial of Clindamycin Versus Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for Uncomplicated Wound Infection.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2016
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Emerging β-lactam non-susceptibility inJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Clinical microbiology reviews · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Revisiting the inoculum effect for Streptococcus pyogenes with a hollow fibre infection model.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Molecular Cloning and Docking ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Asha C BowenMenzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia. asha.bowen@menzies.edu.au
Rachael A Lilliebridge
Steven Y C Tong
Robert W Baird
Peter Ward
Malcolm I McDonald
Bart J Currie
Jonathan R Carapetis
Charles Darwin University · AUMenzies School of Health Research · AUAustin Health · AUJames Cook University · AURoyal Darwin Hospital · AUThe Kids Research Institute Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Streptococcus pyogenes is commonly believed to be resistant to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT), resulting in reservations about using SXT for skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI) where S. pyogenes is involved. S. pyogenes' in vitro susceptibility to SXT depends on the medium's thymidine content. Thymidine allows S. pyogenes to bypass the sulfur-mediated inhibition of folate metabolism and, historically, has resulted in apparently reduced susceptibility of S. pyogenes to sulfur antibacterials. The low thymidine concentration in Mueller-Hinton agar (MHA) is now regulated. We explored S. pyogenes susceptibility to SXT on various media. Using two sets of 100 clinical S. pyogenes isolates, we tested for susceptibility using SXT Etests on MHA containing defibrinated horse blood and 20 mg/liter β-NAD (MHF), MHA with sheep blood (MHS), MHA alone, MHA with horse blood (MHBA), and MHA with lysed horse blood (MHLHBA). European Committee on Antibacterial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) breakpoints defined susceptibility (MIC, ≤ 1 mg/liter) and resistance (MIC, >2 mg/liter). In study 1, 99% of S. pyogenes isolates were susceptible to SXT on MHA, MHBA, and MHLHBA, with geometric mean MICs of 0.04, 0.04, and 0.05 mg/liter, respectively. In study 2, all 100 S. pyogenes isolates were susceptible to SXT on MHF, MHS, MHA, and MHLHBA with geometric mean MICs of 0.07, 0.16, 0.07, and 0.09 mg/liter, respectively. This study confirms the in vitro susceptibility of S. pyogenes to SXT, providing support for the use of SXT for SSTIs. A clinical trial using SXT for impetigo is ongoing.

Indexed as

AdolescentAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsChildChild, PreschoolCulture MediaHumansInfantMicrobial Sensitivity TestsStreptococcal InfectionsStreptococcus pyogenesTrimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug CombinationAnti-Bacterial AgentsCulture MediaTrimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination

Identifiers

PMID23052313
PMCPMC3502963
OpenAlexW2092285564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.