ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2013
Selecting subsets of genotyped experimental populations for phenotyping to maximize genetic diversity.
Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Genomic assisted selection for enhancing line breeding: merging genomic and phenotypic selection in winter wheat breeding programs with preliminary yield trials.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2017Article
- Association Analysis in Rice: From Application to Utilization.Frontiers in plant science · 2016Review
- The genetics of rhizosheath size in a multiparent mapping population of wheat.Journal of experimental botany · 2015Article
- MAGIC populations in crops: current status and future prospects.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Selective phenotyping is a way of capturing the benefits of large population sizes without the need to carry out large-scale phenotyping and hence is a cost-effective means of capturing information about gene-trait relationships within a population. The diversity within the sample gives an indication of the efficiency of this information capture; less diversity implies greater redundancy of the genetic information. Here, we propose a method to maximize genetic diversity within the selected samples. Our method is applicable to general experimental designs and robust to common problems such as missing data and dominant markers. In particular, we discuss its application to multi-parent advanced generation intercross (MAGIC) populations, where, although thousands of lines may be genotyped as a large population resource, only hundreds may need to be phenotyped for individual studies. Through simulation, we compare our method to simple random sampling and the minimum moment aberration method. While the gain in power over simple random sampling for all tested methods is not large, our method results in a much more diverse sample of genotypes. This diversity can be applied to improve fine mapping resolution once a QTL region has been detected. Further, when applied to two wheat datasets from doubled haploid and MAGIC progeny, our method detects known QTL for small sample sizes where other methods fail.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23052022What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.