Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23051871›Full record

ArticleCancer nursing

ResearchTracking: Monitoring gender and ethnic minority recruitment and retention in cancer symptom studies.

Hsiu-Ying Huang, Miriam O Ezenwa, Diana J Wilkie, M Kay Judge

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Non-pharmacological cancer pain interventions in populations with social disparities: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2016
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Targeted Strategies for Recruitment and Engagement of Latinx Immigrants in Longitudinal Biobehavioral Research.Hispanic health care international : the official journal of the National Association of Hispanic Nurses · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hsiu-Ying HuangNursing Department, Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Miriam O Ezenwa
Diana J Wilkie
M Kay Judge

Funding

COMPUTERIZED SYMPTOM REPORT CONSULT FOR CANCER PATIENTSR01CA081918 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WILKIE, DIANA J · 1999 to 2006
$3.9M
COMPUTERIZED PAIN REPORT &NURSING PAIN CONSULT PROTOCOR01CA062477 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WILKIE, DIANA J · 1999 to 2001
$875k
NCI NIH HHS 1R01 CA81918NCI NIH HHS 2R01 CA62477NCI NIH HHS R01 CA062477NCI NIH HHS R01 CA081918
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecruiting and retaining participants for clinical trials, particularly women and ethnic minorities, are challenging. Few studies, however, examine gender and ethnic differences in research processes. Such information is important for findings to adequately represent the available population.

objectiveThe study aim was to examine study recruitment processes (referral, eligibility, consent/enrollment) and study retention (completion) for gender and ethnic differences.

methodsA descriptive comparative analysis of data from 2 randomized clinical trials focused on cancer outpatients with pain and/or fatigue. A computerized ResearchTracking software allowed documentation of recruitment and retention effort outcomes.

resultsAmong the 1464 referred patients, 612 (42%) were eligible for study participation. Lack of ongoing care at the study settings and lack of English skills were the main reasons for ineligibility. There were no gender differences in consent/enrollment or completion rates. Ethnic minority patients were represented proportionally to the available population (13%) and were equally willing to consent/enroll and complete both studies as their white counterparts, if they were eligible.

conclusionsSpecific strategies to target language eligibility barriers are necessary to increase minority participation. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Future studies could include audio-aided tools in their native language to help recruit patients with limited English skills, if the study tools can be validly translated into other languages and are equivalent to English versions. Efforts to educate and garner support of providers could improve enrollment of patients in cancer studies, especially in studies of audio- or video-recorded patient-provider interaction.

Indexed as

EthnicityMinority GroupsPatient CompliancePatient SelectionWhite PeopleAdultChronic PainClinical Trials as TopicCommunication BarriersFatigueFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHumansMaleNeoplasmsRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID23051871
PMCPMC3639328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.